User talk:Gooduncle
Welcome!
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/50/Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg/300px-Chocolate_chip_cookies.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/bc/Face-grin.svg/25px-Face-grin.svg.png)
Welcome to Wikipedia, Gooduncle! I am SarekOfVulcan and have been editing Wikipedia for quite some time. I just wanted to say hi and welcome you to Wikipedia! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page or by typing {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. I love to help new users, so don't be afraid to leave a message! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Oh yeah, I almost forgot, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!
SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:45, 3 March 2009 (UTC)
Mass adding of external links
[edit]This is generally a bad idea. Could you please get consensus for adding links to this site before adding it to any more articles? Thanks. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:41, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- I've asked for more opinions on Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 20:47, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
- In that discussion, now archived at Wikipedia:External links/Noticeboard/Archive 2#http://www.mainegenealogy.net/, the people who joined the discussion felt that there was no need to add links to that site to every Maine article. Based on that discussion, I'm going to have to ask you to stop adding the link for now. If you can get consensus for adding it, such as at the Maine WikiProject, that's fine, but until then, I'll have to consider adding it randomly to be disruptive editing, and could result in your being blocked. --SarekOfVulcan (talk) 05:30, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:02, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)