User talk:Gregg02
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- An introduction to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Be bold
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I removed the text from Herschell Gordon Lewis as it appears to violate the copyright of [1]
Your original contributions remain very welcome.
If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! User:Zeimusu
Angel episodes
[edit]Hi there! I notice that you're adding a lot of Angel episodes in quick succession. Where are you getting them from? Also, please put a blurb at the beginning mentioning something to the effect of "This is an episode of the television series Angel (TV series)" or something. They need context, the title isn't enough. - CHAIRBOY (☎) 04:57, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Whoa, slow down, tiger! You're creating a lot of cleanup work in your wake. Also, where are you getting this rapid-fire info from? These almost look like copyright violations, especially since they're coming in so fast. Thanks. - Lucky 6.9 06:08, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
This is really looking a bit suspicious. I've place a fifteen-minute block on your account until we can get to the bottom of this. If you're posting copyright violations and/or running an unauthorized bot, you stand to lose your privileges for good. Please leave word on my talk page. Thanks again. Sorry to have to do this, but I've never seen so many articles arrive in such rapid succession. - Lucky 6.9 06:11, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
You've tried to log on anonymously at least twice according to the logs so I know you've gotten my message. Please, what are you doing, how are you doing it and would you please stop it? - Lucky 6.9 06:17, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
Plus the episodes all need cleaning up and you haven't added infoboxes or anything, which is what we are trying to do at the moment. If you're going to add episodes at least add them properly with the proper formatting and an infobox. --Cooksey 11:29, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
- The method of quickly adding very short plot summaries, and the refusal to answer on the Talk page, makes me think this is the same person as Special:Contributions/EditingAllison, who added something like 20 episodes of "That's So Raven" last night, most of which were marked for speedy deletion by a number of editors before anybody figured out that they were part of a bigger plan. See also Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/A_Fish_Called_Raven.
- Gregg02, by doing all of this without talking to anyone else or answering the questions of an administrator, you run the risk that the consensus will be against keeping all of these articles, and that they'll be merged or deleted later. It's probably a good idea to respond to comments of others. Personally I don't think one- or two-sentence episode capsules are worth their own articles, and I am concerned that you are copying them in from some other source, in which case they will definitely get deleted. bikeable (talk) 17:57, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
You have also been leaving a fair number of them as orphaned, which means they are not in any categories; please always put new articles in a category. --Cooksey 15:41, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
Angel episodes
[edit]Please stop putting in new articles for Angel episodes and leaving them totally orphaned (without categories), plus you are not using the correct style and they appear to be copied from another site. This is not helping the encyclopedia as they will just be deleted if they are deemed to be copied or too short for their own articles. --Cooksey 23:49, 7 January 2006 (UTC)
Dead -> Killed
[edit]Hi there, I notice you have been going through a number of battle articles and changing, among other things, instances of the word "dead" in infoboxes to "killed". I just thought I'd drop you a line and let you know that it is standard to used "dead" as opposed to "killed" (as shown here). Cheers, --Loopy e 21:54, 11 January 2006 (UTC)
Source for casualties
[edit]Hello, can you please add the source from where u were able to add the 500,000 and 400,000 figure here, mentioned in the Indo-Pakistani War of 1971? Tx Idleguy 07:38, 17 February 2006 (UTC)
Foreign horror movie plot descriptions
[edit]I've reverted all of these that you added, as they were surely copyright violations. Wasted Time R 21:58, 1 May 2006 (UTC)
The article Deep Down has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Entirely in-universe, no sources.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 06:34, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Deep Down is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Deep Down until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:21, 3 November 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Redefinition for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Redefinition is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Redefinition until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Rotten regard Softnow 23:41, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:04, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
The article Bachelor Party (Angel) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:NTV. No reliable sources can be found and the article has sat unreferenced for 7 years
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chumash11 (talk) 13:07, 2 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Judgment (Angel) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Judgment (Angel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
DonaldD23 talk to me 00:43, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Untouched (Angel) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Untouched (Angel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
DonaldD23 talk to me 18:12, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Sleep Tight (Angel) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sleep Tight (Angel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
DonaldD23 talk to me 18:15, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Release (Angel) for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Release (Angel) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
DonaldD23 talk to me 16:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
The article To Shanshu in L.A. has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Does not appear to be a notable episode.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 00:30, 23 October 2023 (UTC)
The article The Thin Dead Line has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2011
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 12:55, 31 October 2023 (UTC)