User talk:Gruk

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. Ichormosquito 09:18, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop inserting photogrpahs into articles without discussing it with the editors of the pages on the talk page first. Many of your insertions are improper and we don't need pictures of the same woman in every article. Also, many of these already have pictures and do not need more. Thank you. pschemp | talk 22:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pschemp has a point and has illustrated it for you in very clear terms. Her methods may be unorthdox and may be unliked by many, but she is a very good editor and administrator and contributes greatly to Wikipedia. If you have any more questions or problems, feel free to contact me on my talk page. Thanks, Cbrown1023 23:48, 31 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Watermelon, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. ¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 08:09, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Welcome!

Hey, Gruk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your contributions. I hope you like the site and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful (some of them may sound stupid, but I recommend you check them out):

The five pillars of Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Help pages
Tutorial
How to write a great article
Manual of Style
The Sandbox — A great place to experiment
WP:Village pump — A good place for help

While editing, please remember:

Be Bold, but not reckless in updating pages
No personal attacks: be upset with the contributions, not the contributor

You should introduce yourself here at the new user log. I hope you enjoy editing and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name, the date, and the time.

For your first edits, I suggest searching for articles that you think might interest you. You could also be audacious and try a random page.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome and happy editing! Cbrown1023 01:40, 10 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Monokini

Monokini is lacking a photo of a woman wearing bikini bottoms but no top- can you help? http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1437020&ref=author, maybe? That photo could possibly also be used for String bikini? 62.56.89.170 21:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Pre-ejaculate on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. –- kungming·2 | ^(Talk·^Contact) 21:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Warning linkimage page

I assuming that you had the best of intentions in changing several articles with the linkimage warning page. It steps on others toes because you left no edit explanation, and you didn't discuss it anyplace. Also, the wording is unusual, as we don't censor, and should not tell people that they might find an image "shocking". If an image is likely to be offensive, we should discuss it with others and change it or remove it.

I notice that user:Pschemp and user:cbrown have discussed this kind of thing with you before. I concur with them, please discuss things first.

On the Wikiproject for sexology and sexuality we are discussing guidelines for images such as those. Also, the project would be a good place to discuss such things as changing the linkimage graphic and warning before doing so on many articles.

Thanks, Atom 22:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nude model

Just because you have freely licensed pictures of a nude model does not mean you need to shoe-horn them into every slightly relevant article. Please think carefully about how useful the picture is, especially when it is likely to be controversial. ed g2s • talk 16:15, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

They were fairly poor illustrations of the subjects. Like I said, use the images if they are relevant. Yes, Wikipedia is not censored, but nor should we go our of our way to use controversial material when it's not necessary. The peep hole bra image, for example, is justified. Also using a posing model to exhibit "public indecency" is simple wrong. ed g2s • talk 16:24, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Biki.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Biki.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:17, 23 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image spamming

Please stop adding images of that same person to multiple articles, as you did to Exhibitionism, Orgasm, Glabrousness, Nudity, Swimsuit and Bikini. These articles already have enough images appropriate to the articles subject matter. If you wish to publicise this model, get a blog. Wikipedia is not the place for self-promotion or promotion of non-notable people. Robotman1974 22:34, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add the images of that model to any more articles. If you think those images should be included in those articles, please discuss that on the relevant talk pages. Robotman1974 19:43, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It does not appear at all to me that you are trying to improve these articles by placing images of Miss Nepomenko into them. It looks quite obvious that you are simply trying to get her image into as many Wikipedia articles as you can. I'm sure the vast number of editors here would agree. Keeping that in mind, I think it is the inclusion of these images that needs to be discussed on the talk pages, not my removal of them. Robotman1974 00:04, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Robotman here, so that is at least one editor who does. Cbrown1023 00:38, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Indexpo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Indexpo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Robotman1974 00:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Indexpo2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Indexpo2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Robotman1974 00:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nepo.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nepo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Robotman1974 00:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nepo2.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nepo2.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Robotman1974 00:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Nepo3.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Nepo3.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Robotman1974 00:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dreamorg.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dreamorg.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Robotman1974 00:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ekbas.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ekbas.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in its not being deleted. Thank you. —Robotman1974 00:11, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Peephole bra for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Peephole bra is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peephole bra until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — btphelps ^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:36, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]