User talk:Gruselfratze

Welcome!

Hello, Gruselfratze, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Corvus cornix_talk 01:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Terra Nova (TV series)

The link you provided does seem to be a reliable source as to the actors' names, but the information you provided as to the character names and their characteristics is not sourced. Corvus cornix_talk 01:38, 5 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

SpongeBob Production Numbers

Hey, I've found two sources which prove that "Oral Report" has the production number 157b. http://spongenews.net/ (a German site) http://www.toonzone.net/forums/showthread.php?t=278865 (SpongeBob SquarePants on Nickelodeon Sat Mar 26 - 10:00am - 157B/155A - TBA / TBA)

Could you please change this detail in the article? I would if I could. --Chrdrenkmann (talk) 18:13, 19 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

List of Shake It Up episodes

Hi there, I see you've made some edits on the List of Shake It Up episodes page restoring the "guest star", "absent main star" and "notes" sections on the page. I tend to agree with you that the information should stay on the page, but there is another editor who seems to feel strongly about removing the information, so I'm asking you to please see the talk page and cast your vote there - simply saying something like - "My vote is to keep the information" and then giving a brief explanation as to why you believe the information should stay (saying something like you did in your last [edit]. Adding your reasoning on the talk page will put you officially on record as to how you see it (There are already two of us who basically agree with you) and will help if the matter is taken to disgreement resolution. Thanks --- Crakkerjakk (talk) 06:53, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bob's Burgler

I left a note with the admin who's been handling the page since An/I, and revisited the idea of a pending changes protection, as was suggested by Ctjf83 (talk). I'm not going to bother reverting him at this point; the admins will do it even if they switch to full, but if you want to get pending changes, it'd be worth it to get your 2¢ in now. He's just not ever going to stop. KnownAlias contact 21:39, 22 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nevandc98 edit-warring at Sonny with a Chance

Nevandc98 has breached the three-revert rule at Sonny with a Chance by making five reverts in less than 14 hours. Accordingly, I have reported him at WP:AN3. As one of the people who reverted him, I have mentioned your edit in the report and you may wish to comment. The discussion may be found here. --AussieLegend (talk) 13:45, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not a fansite

Wikipedia is not a fansite. If you want to add unsourced opinion and excruciating detials, please do so on the Victorious fan wiki and not on List of Victorious episodes. Your edit has been reverted - see Talk:List of Victorious episodes for the various reasons it is inappropriate for Wikipedia's article. Active Banana (^bananaphone 22:52, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

I said a RELIABLE SOURCE is required. It's very clear, thanks. Qantasplanes (Talk with me) 11:54, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

TV Guide is a reliable source. Stop to remove info's from reliable source or you will block. -- Gruselfratze (talk) 11:59, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Really how could that be a reliable source. That's just a piece of unconfirmed info. Your final warning or I'll get an administrator. Qantasplanes (Talk with me) 12:01, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

When this is not a reliable source for you, ich ask you: What is reliable source for you? TV Guide is use in several places in the article and the other reference is from Nickelodeon. -- Gruselfratze (talk) 12:06, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ok it is. But you have to wait until it airs first like any other show in Wiki. Qantasplanes (Talk with me) 12:10, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

In other articles it is just done as I did in this. See List of True Blood episodes, List of Burn Notice episodes etc. So why I can not make it in this? -- Gruselfratze (talk) 12:15, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

June 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on List of SpongeBob SquarePants episodes. Users are expected to collaborate with others and avoid editing disruptively.

In particular, the three-revert rule states that:

Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you continue to edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dabomb87 (talk) 14:21, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:28, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]