User talk:Guitargirl300

Help me!

August 2019

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:John Kilner, from its old location at User:Guitargirl300/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. -Liance^{talk/contribs} 18:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Guitargirl300, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -Liance^{talk/contribs} 18:48, 28 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... I submitted an article on John Kilner back in August. The note said it can take 4 months, and it's almost been 4 months now... any idea when this might get reviewed? Thanks for your help! :)

Guitargirl300 (talk) 23:53, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Guitargirl300, I'm Alfie. Please be aware that the Articles for Creation process is entirely volunteer-driven, and there's no deadline on reviewing AfC submissions. Please be patient, and somebody will get round to your article eventually! -- a ^{they/them | argue | contribs} 00:37, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thank you! Guitargirl300 (talk) 03:58, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to check, is the draft in the correct place to be reviewed for posting? Thanks! Guitargirl300 (talk) 17:28, 13 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have edited my article on John F. Kilner, but I have no idea if it's in the right place to be reviewed again, can anyone tell? Also, does it go back in the general mix (where it can take up to 4 months to be reviewed), or will it likely be reviewed any sooner? Thanks so much for your help! Guitargirl300 (talk) 03:54, 10 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kilner (December 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

He is certainly notable , but this is an over-personal biographical tribute, not an encyclopedia article

1)Decrease the amount of personal title

2)Student awards are not encyclopedic content

3)try for conciseness, both in the bio and the research projects

4)select only 1 or 2 notable works for the infobox.

5) List his books, in standard bibliographical iformat. If there are substantial reviews from third-party independent reliable sources, link to them, but do not quote them

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Kilner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Kilner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 09:51, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Guitargirl300! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 09:51, 14 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have edited my article on John F. Kilner, but I have no idea if it's in the right place to be reviewed again, can anyone tell? Also, does it go back in the general mix (where it can take up to 4 months to be reviewed), or will it likely be reviewed any sooner? Thanks so much for your help! Guitargirl300 (talk) 03:06, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Help me!

Hello, I edited my article on John F. Kilner 2 months ago, but I have no idea if it's in the right place to be reviewed again, can anyone tell? Also, does it go back in the general mix (where it can take up to 4 months to be reviewed), or will it likely be reviewed any sooner? Thanks so much for your help! Guitargirl300 (talk) 03:08, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kilner (March 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You have not fixed it. Remove all statements of praise. Remove all statements in vague terms about his importance. Every specific fact about his life needs a reliable source--every award, every publication. First step is usually to remove every adjective in the entire draft.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Kilner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Kilner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 02:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Kilner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Kilner. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 18:03, 21 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Kilner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Kilner. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 21:24, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

re-reviewing and COI

I think Kilner is notable , and since in my opinion the article remains unsatisfactorily verbose and promotional , I am willing to either edit and accept it myself, or ask some other editor to do so. But before I do that, Since this is your only contribution, and since it is written in an unencyclopedic manner, it is reasonable to ask whether you are a connected contributor, in which case you must declare the connection. Please see our rules on Conflict of Interest If you are writing this for pay or as a staff member of the organization, see also WP:PAID for the necessary disclosures. I will review it as soon as you inform me that you have provided the necessary information . DGG ( talk ) 21:30, 26 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, thank you for taking the time to keep looking this over, i really appreciate it! To answer your question yes, I am his daughter. I am working off factual information from his career which I have carefully footnoted, and I tried to model this article off of Wikipedia articles about other influential academics and theological ethicists. You are right—I have not written a Wikipedia article before, and I did not know you needed to know any author-subject connection if the article was well-footnoted/cited. Sorry! Will this somehow invalidate the article? Guitargirl300 (talk) 22:26, 27 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kilner (March 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by NoahDavid771 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Almost all the sources are primary.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Kilner and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Kilner, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Noah!^💬 21:51, 2 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:John Kilner

Hello, Guitargirl300. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John Kilner, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:03, 2 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:John Kilner has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John Kilner. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 10:30, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Kilner has been accepted

John Kilner, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 10:31, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]