User talk:Gurch/Archive 1

This is an archive of past discussions about User:Gurch. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

→

Archive 5

Welcome

Hello, Gurch, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! -- Longhair | Talk 10:37, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Impersonation

I wondered when you'd show up, Gurch. You realise you could face a permanent block for impersonation of a much-liked and trusted Wikipedian? Nevertheless, I shall be content with a warning. I don't appreciate the snide little comments on my user talk page, and if I find any more, I shall be taking it to dispute resolution. Rob Church ^{Talk | FAHD} 16:07, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Dispute resolution won't be necessary, actually. I will personally see to it that you are blocked from Wikipedia if you do step out of line, and I can assure you that impersonation of another Wikipedian is viewed most dimly by the Wikipedia community. So please, no more snide comments, and let's play nice. If you can't do that, then you will be blocked. Regards, --NicholasTurnbull | (talk) (e-mail) (cabal) 16:22, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

After reading the thoroughly reasonable and downright pleasant comment you placed on User talk:NicholasTurnbull, I would like to apologise for jumping to conclusions, Gurch. Clearly your intentions are neither to discredit me nor to damage the wiki, and I was unaware that you'd been contributing for so long. Gurch did mention it, perhaps, but it would have slipped.

The initial worry of mine was that the nickname Gurch had come back to haunt me - as you know, I'm not that person any more, and haven't been for a long time.

I hope you will accept my heartfelt apologies for not assuming good faith, and perhaps we'll end up editing something together one day. All the best, Rob Church ^{Talk | FAHD} 00:56, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Invoked

Done that. It seems you can be useful. That's good. Rob Church ^{Talk | FAHD} 16:23, 20 October 2005 (UTC)

Main Page vandalism

No, the vandalism was not done by an admin. It was, however, the fault of a newbie admin that neglected to protect it, and who I will righteously admonish shortly. The version you saw that said 'protected' was cached on the vandalized version (in fact it had actually already been reverted to the non-vandal version by someone before me), and so I purged the cache to fix it for everyone.--Pharos 12:46, 4 November 2005 (UTC)

Speedy Copyvios

Thanks for pointing out the [[Michael Ortega]] article -- it has been speedily deleted under the new copyright speedy rule -- anything less than 48 hours old that is a clear copyvio can go. Thought you might like to know you can use the speedy tag in the future. :) .:.Jareth.:. ^babelfish 17:30, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

speedydel

Hi Gurch, thanks for re-inserting the CSD tag on [[Boyoscorporation]]. I just speedy deleted it. --Gurubrahma 16:51, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

Boo!

Free drugs? :( El_C 12:49, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Incidentally, I just noticed your moderately tense stress-o'-meter — of course, you know what I recommend for that (hint: it's free!). Seriously though (though I was serious!), let me know if there's anything I could do to help. Regards, El_C 13:58, 25 December 2005 (UTC)

Boilerplates/Templates

Hi, could you tell me why you removed some of the templates I placed on a couple of articles? In my reasoning, it shouldn't really matter as the articles get added to categories when the templates are added so people interested in those areas will work on the specific thing they are interested in? So removing them reduces the chance of some things occurring.-Localzuk (talk) 13:20, 16 January 2006 (UTC)

List of UK places

Hi Gurch: Thanks for your work on this vast sub-project. —Theo (Talk) 21:56, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: The vale

It's not the same place as Castle Vale is it? Joe D (t) 18:39, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Oh, no, I'm very much an inclusionist when it comes to places! Joe D (t) 21:16, 24 January 2006 (UTC)

Vandalism

I think I might have gotten the wrong IP for whatever reason - sorry. Jamyskis Whisper, Contribs 18:38, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

X2 "assasination" Fix

I just wanted to thank you for catching my misspelling of "assassination" in the X2 movie article. It came as a surprise that I’ve been missing the second “ss” for all these years.

A very good catch. Thanks again. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by KNHaw (talk • contribs) 19:16, 8 February 2006 (UTC).

Participant alert regarding Wikiproject on Advertising

The Wikiproject No Ads, created as a backlash against the Answers.com deal, has served an important function in providing a space for users to express their disagreement with the Foundation proposal. While the current controversies about userboxes raise questions about political and social advocacy on Wikipedia, there should be greater flexibility regarding advocacy about Wikipedia in the Wikipedia namespace. Reported and linked by Slashdot and other press sources as a unique and spontaneous occurence in Wikipedia history, it has apparently had some impact as, despite being scheduled to begin in January, not a peep has been heard about the trial and proposed sponsored link since the deal's controversial announcement months ago. Currently, however, there is an attempt to delete the project or move it off Wikipedia altogether. Since the Foundation has provided no additional information and has not attempted to answer the specific questions that participants in the project raised, it is unclear if the Answers.com deal has been abandoned or simply delayed. Until the situation becomes more clear, I believe the group should still have a place in the Wikipedia namespace. Sincerely, Tfine80 00:03, 10 February 2006 (UTC)

Absorption

Thank you! I did most of the myss sbelling you korectet. My englich is good, but this stupid writting allways makes problems. Stone 12:26, 22 February 2006 (UTC)

Achive 14 for Freemasonry "Scratchpad"

No this was 'not' an error. It 'is' an archived page, not used for some time. Read Talk:Freemasonry/Archive 14 Book Mouse 22:21, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Ok I see what you are on about ;) I'm just doing some Janitorial work. I DO NOT want these Freemason guys making me part of a freeway (GULP!) :) Book Mouse 22:27, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Just called back to say the Freemason guys are making me part of a freeway (GULP!) They did not like my work @ Talk:Freemasonry/Archive 14(Bet your next!) :) Book Mouse 00:38, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

Chew Valley Lake FAC

Hi, I've resubmitted Chew Valley Lake as a featured article candidate, because it didn't receive enough support last time.

As you have edited this page in the past I wondered if you would be willing to visit and comment/support on the nomination? Rod 20:11, 26 February 2006 (UTC)

Intelligent Medical Imaging

Thanks for "bankrupcy -> bankruptcy". Does this mean you've now started with the 'B's? :) --Stephane Charette 16:50, 28 February 2006 (UTC)

RE Redbrick

No problem. I realised some other university newspapers have their own article and thought Redbrick deserved its own as well. Jxb311 16:39, 1 March 2006 (UTC)

Aurora (ship)

Thanks for fixing "Antartic -> Antarctic" I tried to make sure they were all correct, I guess I missed one. I was wondering if you would like some help on this project? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Nekura (talk • contribs) 17:58, 1 March 2006 (UTC).

[sic]

Please do not correct misspellings in quoted material when those misspellings are marked with "[sic]," for instance, in the Nuwaubianism page, which you have incorrectly corrected three times now. -Moorlock 19:13, 7 March 2006 (UTC)

Let me reiterate that with respect to Muse (band) on which you have reverted the spelling "apparantly" twice now, in the context of a block quoted press release that is clearly littered with mistakes. If you're using some sort of automated process, then you need to take more care. Every edit is your responsibility, and if the system can't allow you to allow for such situations then it can't be used. BigBlueFish 16:37, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Railway station articles

Hi,

I notice that you're creating large numbers of near-identical articles for relatively minor railway stations. Are these necessary? They appear doomed to perma-stub status, which indicates that they should not be separate articles in the first place.

I'd like your opinion before I mass-AfD them....

Fourohfour 14:37, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

My response to your reply is at my page (as you chose to reply there). Fourohfour 15:36, 9 March 2006 (UTC)

Des Clarke

Hi, that's for the spelling change on the Des Clarke, what I'd like to know is, how did you notice it? think it was acheivment(is that correct?!) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Jayteecork (talk • contribs) 15:15, 10 March 2006.

Ah thanks, but the master of spelling changes left 'Onece' for Once on my talk page! Jayteecork 14:15, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Happy birthday!

Happy birthday from a member of the Wikipedia:Birthday Committee! - File:Ottawa flag.png nath a nrdotcom ^{(T • C • W)} 05:41, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Happy Birthday!--Ali K 15:43, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the birthday greetings. Many happy returns for the day to you too! -- Francs 2000 23:28, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

Re Db-meta

You requested that the talk page link error in the speedy delete master template be fixed. I hope I've done just that; see whether what I've tweaked is what you were referring to. haz _(user talk)^e 18:20, 10 March 2006

Bot flag

Hi there Gurch! I wanted to let you know that you need to apply for a bot flag to be running such frequent edits. Wikipedia:Bots is the place to check this out; for now you can put your name under 'bots running without a flag'. Until you get this flag, please keep your edits to no more than a few a minute. Thanks! JoeSmack ^Talk 18:29, 13 March 2006 (UTC)

Heya Gurch. The word bot implies any form of systematic machine assisted editing - usually this means in a quick and efficent fashion. You can ask Wikipedia_talk:Bots if you'd like to see if your case applies, but I am guessing you've made 5000+ minor edits in close succession with the help of some sort of programing. The fact that it is manually assisted by you the user makes the people over at Wikipedia:Bots much happier I'm sure, as no automatic spell checker is 100% accurate.

The 'bot flag' makes your changes not appear on 'recent changes'. In a way this keeps it clear for the admins to see if any kind of weird stuff is going down (used to observe possible vandalism, attacks, mistakes, lots of stuff). If your making 6 edits a minute thats gonna clog that log/tool for those who need it for important things. Secondly it means your operating under a edit policy that is clearly defined for those who are concerned of abuses. Finally, it keeps admins from knowing your not trying to mess stuff up, which some bots can come off as.

As for if you need to make a new account I'm not positive, but it just makes the person and the function seperate for everyone's sanity. Again, I'd ask Wikipedia_talk:Bots about this.

I'll leave a similar message to User:Fuhghettaboutit and User:Cmdrjameson about their editing if it is indeed necessary, but I didn't single you out by any means, I just noticed. Regardless of whether or not they've been editing at a speed too fast to do without a bot flag, it does not make your absence of the same OK.

Hope I've been some help. JoeSmack ^Talk 01:56, 14 March 2006 (UTC)

Heck, you waited the week; you might as well hop over to metawiki and get the bot flag (you're really just one message away). JoeSmack ^Talk 15:28, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

P.S. Thanks for "refered", you saved me a whole day! ;) JoeBot 15:31, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Glasgow Railway Stations

Gurch,

You have included a lot of train stations as being in Glasgow when they are anything but. Balloch, Alexandria, Craigendoran and Cardross are some that I have spotted.

User:Big Jim Fae Scotland, 14 March 2006, 16:15

Thanks!

Thank you for pointing out the date problem on my user page. Not sure how I ended up thinking this year is 2007! -- BrownHairedGirl 09:45, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

Thank you

For your comment about my bot and I will only run it when i can watch it.(I also replied on the request for bot approval). I Lov E Plankton 13:34, 19 March 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Stubs: Catherine Field, New South Wales; Antoinette Sibley; German East Asia Squadron; Higher heating value; Genis-Vell; RAF Cottesmore; Peter Steele; Wyoming class battleship; Brother Blood; Koumbi Saleh; Fondor Shipyards; Steinbach, Manitoba; Manne Siegbahn; Zafar; Magma Dragoon; Ironbottom Sound; Oliver Coipel; Carl Charlier; Imperial Death Squadron

Cleanup: Chase (comics); Workers' Defence Committee; Battle of Karbala
Merge: John C. Stennis Battle Group; Battle of Duro (Clone Wars); Cadia
Add Sources: Abaddon the Despoiler; National College Of Arts, Lahore; Kuat Drive Yards
Wikify: Kimber Rickabaugh; Commerce Guild Support Destroyer; Market system
Expand: Thakurgaon District; MC Lyte; Coombs test

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways, from comparing articles that need work to other articles you've edited, to choosing articles randomly (ensuring that all articles with cleanup tags get a chance to be cleaned up). It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 13:54, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Request for Proofreading

I've noticed that you are probably Wikipedia's most respected typo-finder/proofreader. Therefore, would you mind giving the Idit Harel Caperton artilce a look for me? I've been working on this article as a long-term featured article project. Unfortunately, I have a terrible time proofing my own writing (and spelling, for that matter). If you can give it a good once-over, I would gladly owe you a wikifavor of some sort. Cheers. youngamerican (talk) 13:32, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Excellent work, thank you very much. I am not much of a speller, as you can see from the caveat on my user page. If you ever need someone to read through an article for some peer review or just some improvement ideas, just let me know. youngamerican (talk) 15:17, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Bradfordville

Thanks for the proofread and edit on Bradfordville. Just as a side note, the Bradfords descend from Oliver Cromwell. Noles1984 16:13, 22 March 2006 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for catching my spelling errors in the US section of the convenience store article. I edited that during my first two days on Wikipedia. I have since started using a text editor with a spell checker. Rob 00:11, 23 March 2006 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Minor Barnstar
		I grant unto thee a small, rusty throwing star for mercilessly hunting down and eradicating thousands and thousands of spelling errors Fuhghettaboutit 03:51, 26 March 2006 (UTC)

Mistake

oh, thanks for catching that one, i appreciate it. and thanks for sparing my poor arm hairs ;) JoeBot 20:50, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

I'm rather sorry

that your 10,000 edit could not have been one of several spelling blunders of mine that you've recently corrected, but thanks for the good work anyway. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Carptrash (talk • contribs) 17:56, 1 April 2006.

Wikipedia survey

Hi. I'm doing a survey of Wikipedia editors as part of a class research project. It's quick, anonymous, and the data will be made available to the Wikipedia community later this month. Would you like to take part? More info here. Thanks! Nonplus 01:23, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Calendar box

Many kind thanks for developing and sharing the calendar box at User:Gurch/Calendar, which I have borrowed for use on my own user page with only a few very slight adaptations (including adding pi day on 14 March). Best wishes. EdK 20:32, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

Stub

Thanks for inserting the stub on Pine Hill Plantation Noles1984 17:40, 9 April 2006 (UTC)

re: User:Gurch/Calendar

May 25 is Towel Day ;) --Quiddity

Thanks for the help

Thanks for reminding me about the tilde thing. I do know about it, but it is not yet second nature. I will go back and add that info. Also, thanks for your paience with me in IRC. Catherineyronwode 22:09, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

Re: Spelling corrections

Heya Gurch. Yeah, i've taken to do em to avoid doing studying (greeeat idea ;). I've also found methods that speed up the process in general. As for awards, *shrug*, i'm just working to improve wikipedia. Keep up the work on your end too, the more the better! :) JoeBot 06:35, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

To Gurch

you are 12 years old. Stop editing people you little boy and get a life. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 88.109.81.154 (talk • contribs) 19:35, 12 April 2006.

I am? News to me. Anyway, you're telling me to get a life? What do you call this? Not to mention this, this and this? I call it a demonstration of the effectiveness of Wikipedia's anti-vandal system, but you seem to call it fun. Begone, vandalous cretin – Gurch 19:20, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Omg leik u r teh NUBZ plz get leif and stop rving my vandalizm thx avill --Avillia 19:30, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

In the news - picture highlight

i copied this to proposals as it fell into MainPage archives. --Quiddity 21:11, 12 April 2006 (UTC)

Sims 2 is semi-protected

3rr on House of Yahweh

You get a stern warning re WP:3RR on House of Yahweh. I'm pretty sure you were acting for the best, but the only exceptions to 3RR are for blatant vandalism, so please be more careful William M. Connolley 19:50, 13 April 2006 (UTC)

so sorry.

finaly. i have control again, thankyou for helping me through it. you have no idea how mad at my computer i am now. Im going to shut it down, to stop any further viruses or problems. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.81.242.121 (talk • contribs) 17:46, 14 April 2006.

A virus, that edits Wikipedia? That's a new one. Oh well, at least you're being polite – Gurch 16:50, 14 April 2006 (UTC)

Thanks -

- for the recent rvv on my user page! Greetings, --Janke | Talk 15:57, 16 April 2006 (UTC)

David Gilmour

Hi, i added a "Test-n (first level warning)" on User talk:58.166.225.137. That user had removed the External Links section from Phil Manzanera as well as from David Gilmour where you reverted their edits. --BNutzer 19:47, 19 April 2006 (UTC)

1WW Refactor

Please see Refactor and New discussion.

You were gracious enough to comment on 1WW; as you may know there are now seven competing proposals. On April 6 I suggested that I be permitted to refactor the proposal page into a single, unified proposal. It's my belief that most of us are tending toward the same or a similar restriction on wheel warring. I think it's unwieldy, though, as it stands. A fair number of editors have commented on these distinct versions but (precisely because they are so similar) no single one has gained undisputed consensus. I suggest that a single, improved version may fare better on its way to policy.

Just as I proposed the refactor, an editor brought to our attention yet another competing proposal, which I merged into the others, using the same format. Still another proposal has since been added, bringing the total to 7. The two new proposals are encountering an indifferent reception but they, too, have some merit.

At the time I suggested refactor, I also put myself forward as the editor to write the initial draft, based on the plurality of support for "my" version. Since the two new proposals have been added, this plurality has held.

I don't for a moment feel that this gives me any special right to dictate terms; rather I hope to draft a proposal uniting the best features of existing proposals. Unlike any of the seven currently competing versions, this refactor will be open to editing immediately by any editor. I will ask editors to refrain from supporting or opposing the new draft for the time being; instead, to edit the proposal to reflect their specific concerns. I believe the true consensus policy will then emerge, in true wiki fashion. After all, we're not so far apart.

I come to your talk page today to ask for your comment on this refactor. Clearly this will be a major change to the proposal page and I don't feel comfortable being quite that bold without some expression of interest in the idea. Once the new draft is in place, I hope also for your participation to polish it into a true expression of our values. Let's move forward with this complement to WP:3RR. John Reid 04:08, 22 April 2006 (UTC)