User talk:Gwaka Lumpa

"a strange 3-way union between Guacamole, Kuala Lumpur and an Oompa Loompa" Geee whiz I wish you put up a picture of the resulting on the internet :o) Tribaal 16:48, 6 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am reliably informed by doctors that such a photograph would bring untold death and destruction throughout the world Gwaka Lumpa 09:10, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Understandable. =) Tribaal 11:59, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nick Herbert

Hi thanks for your message - I saw your posting on southampton university but i have no idea if it same person - his website doesnt mention it nor does any of the election materials but does mention rest of education - not an unusual name, but if you recognise the face who am I to argue? :) - but have never met him so just don't know for sure.

Ok Gwaka Lumpa (talk) 19:20, 24 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia comments

Dear Gwaka, Thanks for the comment! But I'd still like to know how to determine if a fact is wrong or not. :) Janet6

The Tale of the Four Dervishes

Your wish has been granted! Maybe it was the time for the acceptance of your prayers and maybe you should have wished for a million dollars? ;) Hassanfarooqi 19:35, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject World music invitation

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject World music

The goal of WikiProject World music is to improve the quality and quantity of information about World music available on Wikipedia. WP:WikiProject World music as a group does not prefer any particular type of World music, but prefers that all World music traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

-- TimNelson 23:51, 9 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Fernando Otero

A tag has been placed on Fernando Otero requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for musical topics.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Gromlakh (talk) 22:35, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Moinuddin_Chishti

Salam, I saw your contributions on this article. Do you have any referecnes about his dream, in which Muhammad (PBUH) ordered him to go to India ? I would be interested in it.

Thanks TwoHorned (talk) 15:29, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Khwaja Sahab

Thank you. Take your time, there's no hurry. If you find references about Moinuddin_Chishti's dream, please tell me. Salam. TwoHorned (talk) 22:44, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Jessie James

A tag has been placed on Jessie James, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Chzz ► 08:15, 3 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fernando Otero

Hi Gwaka Lumpa. I just did a bit of format editing on the Fernando Otero article. You obviously have a wealth of information about the musician, and the article would benefit substantially if your sources were included as references. XL2D (talk) 17:57, 21 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Drugi Nacin

I will make an article about Drugi Način in the next couple of days. I will notify you when I finish. Ostalocutanje (talk) 15:07, 25 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I created the article about Drugi Način. Ostalocutanje (talk) 12:59, 27 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copyvio in YouTube videos

Besides failing WP:EL as simply a personal video, it had obvious copyright infringements. I've removed it, please don't add such videos again. Dougweller (talk) 08:27, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ifan boy

A tag has been placed on Ifan boy, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an "attack page", and appears to be primarily intended to disparage or threaten its subject. This includes biographies of living people that are unsourced and entirely negative in tone. (See section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not make statements attacking people or groups of people. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks; attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images will be blocked from editing Wikipedia.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Forgot to put name (talk) 17:23, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gwaka Lumpa. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringement

I have speedy deleted Chisht as an unambiguous copyright infringement from [1] and [2]. Bishonen | talk 09:48, 18 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]

I don't remember being involved in edits on this page, but I have certainly never visited either of the webpages you quote. It is certainly a noteworthy place, so it seems a shame to delete it on the grounds that some of the content coincided with the content in these pages. Perhaps they took their content from Wikipedia in the first place? Gwaka Lumpa (talk) 12:27, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gwaka Lumpa. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gwaka Lumpa. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Gribbly" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Gribbly has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 11 § Gribbly until a consensus is reached. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 07:08, 11 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]