User talk:HalMartin

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome all efforts to improve the encyclopaedia and would love to have your help. You might find some useful information at Wikipedia:Introduction. However, edits like this and personal attacks like these will not be tolerated and if you continue to edit in such a manner you will be swiftly banned. Please bear this in mind going forward. Thank you, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 08:22, 21 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

July 2018

Please do not add defamatory content to Wikipedia, as you did to David Hogg (activist), especially if it involves living persons. Thank you. NorthBySouthBaranof (talk) 18:29, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Doug Weller talk 18:42, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Bacondrum (talk) 22:13, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Equivocasmannus (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

HalMartin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

My account is not in any way linked to user:equivocusmannus, as is alleged. Any admin can see this by viewing the IP logs.

Decline reason:

Speaking as the admin who blocked Equivocasmannus, the similarity in behavior and overlap in edits and interests is convincing. Acroterion (talk) 23:58, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substi

For any review admin, see the recurring edit war at White culture: Special:Diff/662553625, Special:Diff/672520295, Special:Diff/678555460, Special:Diff/838349607. Also, general overlap in interests. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 23:17, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Already challenged, "RobotNinjaPirate". Quite how you think you can get away with hounding me along with your pals is pretty sickening.--HalMartin (talk) 23:22, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Also for reviewing admins, this user has urged other users to commit suicide in the past: Special:Diff/811328340, and edited Lena Dunham's article to describe her as a "fat pig" Special:Diff/903473857 among with other acts of vandalism and personal attacks. Bacondrum (talk) 23:35, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

First off, I did not urge anyone to commit suicide. No fair-minded person would say I did. It was obviously a joke, admittedly in poor taste. As far as the Lena Dunham article, I admit MAYBE I deserve a block for that.--HalMartin (talk) 23:37, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You absolutely did urge another user to commit suicide: "It must be worth ur dignity. Shame the truth got us Brexit you fucking stooge. Go hang urself" your words, verbatim. Bacondrum (talk) 23:43, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yep, "urself" is leet-speak, commonly used to mean the person saying the words is JOKING.--HalMartin (talk) 23:45, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, suicide is hilarious. Bacondrum (talk) 23:49, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anything can be funny, anyway, if my block is not rescinded, I will just make another account. Do you not know how fucking easy it is to do that? Grow the fuck up, lol.--HalMartin (talk) 23:52, 13 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Grow the fuck up, lol" says the person with nothing better to do than troll Wikipedia. Priceless. Bacondrum (talk) 00:05, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

How much did you get bullied at school?--HalMartin (talk) 00:07, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. If the block is a CheckUser or Oversight block, was made by the Arbitration Committee or to enforce an arbitration decision (arbitration enforcement), or is unsuitable for public discussion, you should appeal to the Arbitration Committee.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:14, 14 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]