User talk:Halynr1600

License tagging for Image:Stevebeshear.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Stevebeshear.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 00:09, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Senate30.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Senate30.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --OrphanBot 01:10, 14 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violation in Image:Girdler.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Girdler.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Girdler.jpg is unquestionably copyright infringement, and no assertion of permission has been made.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Girdler.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 23:31, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Halyn Roth"

A page you created, Halyn Roth, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Author requests deletion, if requested in good faith, and provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author. If the author blanks the page, this can be taken as a deletion request.

As you created the page, and have removed all content from it, it is assumed that you wish for it to be deleted. If this is not the case, you should restore the previous content of the page

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you – Gurch 21:04, 25 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Beshearsteve.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Beshearsteve.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 02:01, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Council2007 010.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Council2007 010.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 02:01, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:L dd5649c8a9dd22514d84db643b4ae0af.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:L dd5649c8a9dd22514d84db643b4ae0af.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 02:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Rothhalyn.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Rothhalyn.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. B (talk) 02:02, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Cityofsomerset.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Cityofsomerset.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Possibly unfree Image:Createimage.jpeg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Createimage.jpeg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by B (talk • contribs) 02:04, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:LtGovOfficialPhotoWeb.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:LtGovOfficialPhotoWeb.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the image description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by B (talk • contribs) 02:07, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Creation of inappropriate articles

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Pulaski County Democratic Party, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. --Orange Mike | Talk 20:20, 2 July 2008 (UTC) member and state convention delegate, Milwaukee County Democratic Party[reply]

Speedy deletion of Roth Carpet and Bedding

A tag has been placed on Roth Carpet and Bedding requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 20:46, 7 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Beshear.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Beshear.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 06:32, 2 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Holbertlogo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Holbertlogo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by STBotI. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:20, 14 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darlene Fitzgerald Price

The article Darlene Fitzgerald Price has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Bio of political candidate. Has not held elected office before, therefore does not meet WP:POLITICIAN.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Crusio (talk) 16:33, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notability criteria

You'll no doubt notice that the Price article is gone. If she gets in, then there'll be an article on her. Or if you can more clearly show a reason to have an article on her even before the election (which you didn't), then I'll restore it. I'm going to think carefully about the Waltz article over the next few days (won't have time to do any serious editing until Tuesday); "executive vice-president of the IWVO" is probably enough of a reason, but I'm not certain yet. DS (talk) 12:36, 9 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

So an article about a legitimate candidate for elected office is not criteria for an article? Halynr1600 (talk) 20:54, 16 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:JohnWaltzLogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:JohnWaltzLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:14, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jim Holbert for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jim Holbert is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jim Holbert until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -LtNOWIS (talk) 06:57, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of John Waltz for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Waltz is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Waltz until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bearcat (talk) 01:31, 21 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]