User talk:Hamidkhatri

Welcome!

Hello, Hamidkhatri, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Abdul Kadar Khatri, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Jakob (talk) 12:16, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Abdul Kadar Khatri

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Abdul Kadar Khatri requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. --Jakob (talk) 12:16, 23 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Hamidkhatri! You created a thread called Douts regarding reference. at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please create a new thread.

Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding Draft Article

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Hello, i want know that is my draft article Draft:Abdul Kadar Khatri now ready to meet wikipedia's guidelines and notability and is with reliable sources ??, looking for early reply, Thank you. Hamidkhatri (talk) 08:03, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've changed this to a standard help request, as a mere review does not specifically require an administrator. 331dot (talk) 08:17, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, Thank you.Hamidkhatri (talk) 09:04, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, please use the blue "Resubmit" button if you would like to resubmit the draft for review. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 10:33, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ToBeFree Thank you for responding, i am still going to work on article but i was eager to know that is my draft article Draft:Abdul Kadar Khatri now ready to meet wikipedia's guidelines and notability and is with reliable sources ??, so that i can work it to make more better.

Hamidkhatri, this is exactly what review is for. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 12:05, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ok ToBeFree, after completing my work on article i will resubmit it for reviewing, can you give me feedback for draft please, it will be pleasure for me if you once check my draft article and give me your opinion, Thank you. Hamidkhatri (talk) 15:38, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hamidkhatri, there are thousands of other drafts waiting for review, and we do not give undue preference to any of them. Please do not ask for special preferential treatment again and wait for a review like everyone else. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:44, 14 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Abdul Kadar Khatri has been accepted

Abdul Kadar Khatri, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 22:45, 18 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

January 2020

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 19:55, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hamidkhatri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked from wikipedia as i was confirmed as User:Roboure, as i dont no him/her, i dont know the reason why was i blocked, i request to unblock me please, as i don't harmed any account nor i will, i am simply tring to contribute on wikipedia, thus if i will be unblocked i hope i will improve wikipedia articles, thank you.

Decline reason:

Based on technical evidence the CU provided and the editing styles, this seems to be sockpuppetry. You need to explain those connections. only (talk) 01:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.