User talk:Hanengerda

Welcome!

Hi, Hanengerda. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. – Joe (talk) 17:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Hanengerda, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! – Joe (talk) 17:22, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

Hello, Hanengerda! I'm Joe Roe. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. – Joe (talk) 17:21, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Joe, thank you very much for your answer. We will just wait and see whether the acticle will be accepted. It has been accepted on the Dutch Wikipedia. We are fairly regular contributors and trustworthy! ;-)

Hi Joe Roe, thanks for all your advice to improve the article on Constant Cornelis Huijsmans. However, the pop-up message that there is an issue with the site concerning inline quotations and sections keeps appearing on my PC, though not on the Ipad. Is there anything I can do about that? Another question I have is the following. In the article on Van Gogh (section: Life, Early years) Huijsmans is mentioned (spelt here as Constantijn C. Huysmans). This site has unfortunately been vandalized and as a result, quite understably, the article is locked. So I have not been able to correct the name of Constant Cornelis Huijsmans in this section. Is there anything I can do about this? Best regards, Hanengerda (talk) 11:36, 30 December 2017 (UTC).[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Constant Cornelis Huijsmans has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Constant Cornelis Huijsmans. Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 18:13, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Constant Cornelis Huijsmans has been accepted

Constant Cornelis Huijsmans, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

– Joe (talk) 21:11, 27 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited George Cheyne (physician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Enlightenment (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

appreciation

You have been doing very nice work in a field that is great need of better coverage here--and of interest to me. DGG ( talk ) 05:33, 3 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 5

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samuel Richardson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Cheyne (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:40, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of An Appeal to All that Doubt (William Law)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on An Appeal to All that Doubt (William Law) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from {{{value1}}}. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CatcherStorm ^talk 17:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I really do not understand why someone wants this page to be deleted. All the sources have been quoted. The text quotations are from books of the eighteenth century, so no copyright infringements. I personally own the copyright to “The Sprititual Side of Samuel Richardson” which are only used as a reference. Duplications, if any, go back to the original sources from the eighteenth century. The Appeal was written in 1742 by William Law, and I personally have the original first edition of 1742. So WHY would anyone want to delete this article? Best regards, Gerda and Han Hanengerda (talk) 18:13, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Fortunately, some experienced Wikipedian (Drm 310) stepped in and removed this “speedy deletion” remark! He added that it had been an unfortunate mistake.

February 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that your username, "Hanengerda", may not meet Wikipedia's username policy because Wikipedia accounts cannot be shared. If you believe that your username does not violate our policy, please leave a note here explaining why. As an alternative, you may ask for a change of username by completing this form, or you may simply create a new account for editing. While it appears you have been a registered user on Wikipedia for some time, it is unfortunate that no one has noticed until now that this account is shared between two people. This is not allowed under Wikipedia's username policy. Each of you will need your own individual accounts, each accessed by one and only one person, for the accounts' entire lifetimes. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 21:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your remark. I would not like to go against Wikipedia policy, so I have made the appropriate changes. The pseudonym Hanengerda will from now on only be used by one person.Hanengerda (talk) 06:49, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (The Way to Divine Knowledge) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating The Way to Divine Knowledge.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

This article spends way too much space on a detailed plot summary. Instead, the article should include more information on the book's context and reception. Please see the "Philosophical literature" section of MOS:PHILO for more information on how to format the article.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:59, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill:

Thank you for reviewing the page on William Law’s “The Way to Divine Knowledge”. I appreciate your comments. There is indeed a lot of detailed plot summary. The reason for this was that the book itself was and still is not widely available. I have been fortunate enough to have been able to buy a contemporary edition. I felt that in order to allow users of Wikipedia to interpret “The Way to Divine Knowledge” on its own merits to quote the original text as much as possible. This way I thought to avoid the contamination of the text with my own interpretation. Also, I thought I avoided the comments of “citation needed”. If you feel the need to delete some of the citations of the book, and if you believe that this will indeed improve the page, that is just fine. I am only sorry to see some of the beautiful prose that William Law wrote to be lost in editing the page. But so be it. As to the reception of William Law’s works, especially as to the reception of his so called “mystical works” which appeared after 1737, I can say that some people liked his “mystical” writings, such as Samuel Richardson, George Cheyne and John Byrom, and even the Methodist Charles Wesley appreciated his works, whereas some people such as William Warburton and the Methodist John Wesley, the brother of Charles Wesley, deeply disliked Law’s “mystical” works. So, you see, very little has changed over the centuries: we are either “for” or “against” someone or something. For the reception of William Law’s works by his contemporaries I refer you to the page on William Law. For a twentieth-century reaction see Aldous Huxley’s comments on the page of William Law. Best regards, Gerda Hanengerda (talk) 17:09, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Rosguill:Dear Rosguill, as per your advice I looked up the "Philosophical literature" section of MOS:PHILO and I have shortened the citations and the text accordingly. I have added some general information as to how the book was received by Law’s contemporaries as well as by some critics of the nineteenth and twentieth century. I hope this will suffice for the page to be accepted as a good Wikipedia contribution and that the tags on top of the page can be removed. Best regards, Gerda. Hanengerda (talk) 07:24, 6 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

New message from Dewritech

Hello, Hanengerda. You have new messages at Dewritech's talk page.
Message added 12:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Dewritech (talk) 12:32, 2 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Louis de Vries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dutch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am not quite sure what you mean with this message. What am I supposed to do? Hanengerda (talk) 07:56, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dick Willebrandts (December 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Dick Willebrandts instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

This draft is either essentially the same as the article with the same name, or a subset of the article with the same name. The draft will be replaced by a redirect from draft space to the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dick Willebrandts and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Dick Willebrandts, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 03:22, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I was under the impression that I had deleted the draft for the article on Dick Willebrandts. Something must have gone wrong. Please remove or delete the current draft. I am very happy with the Wikipedia article on Dick Willebrandts as it is now. Thank you and best regards, Hanengerda (talk) 07:54, 31 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:46, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:40, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:23, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Post-Vac for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Post-Vac is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Post-Vac until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

(t · c) buidhe 14:13, 15 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Punctuation

Hello, I saw your editing of Tintagel. These captions are not sentences so need not have been changed. Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Captions Johnsoniensis (talk) 20:52, 10 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for drawing my attention to this English Wikipedia article on Captions.

Hanengerda (talk) 07:05, 11 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]