User talk:HappyWanderer15/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about User:HappyWanderer15. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Welcome!
Hello, HappyWanderer15, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! -TFD (talk) 23:04, 13 June 2015 (UTC)
Hello
|
The Friendship Barnstar | |
| Nice to meet you. I consider Wikipedia to be among the most important and significant cultural expressions of our time. . Buster Seven Talk 23:38, 13 June 2015 (UTC) |
HappyWanderer15, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!
|
Hi HappyWanderer15!! You're invited: learn how to edit Wikipedia in under an hour. I hope to see you there! Ocaasi |
Disambiguation link notification for August 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Bernie Sanders, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Hill. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bernie Sanders
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Bernie Sanders you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tortle -- Tortle (talk) 05:40, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bernie Sanders
The article Bernie Sanders you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Bernie Sanders for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Tortle -- Tortle (talk) 06:40, 26 August 2015 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of Bernie Sanders
The article Bernie Sanders you nominated as a good article has failed 
; see Talk:Bernie Sanders for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Ravpapa -- Ravpapa (talk) 15:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)
License tagging for File:Tony-demello.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tony-demello.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.
To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 05:09, 14 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:11, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Feelin' the...
So good to see you back! Both articles are in need of some TLC. Gandydancer (talk) 19:53, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- Happy to help! I've noticed that there is a lot of information that has been added when it was news and that the organization of information often seems kind of random. Which articles do you mean, specifically? Presidential campaign? Political positions? Which sections would you say need the most work? HappyWanderer15 (talk) 20:06, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
- The Bernie campaign article mostly right now. I have only a few minutes a day and have been able to do only very little. I have felt blessed in that there has been a good bunch of editors that have made our job easy and fun. On the other hand, there has been hardly any help at all when it comes to getting new info into the article. Missing right now is the incredible history that we have watched happen. He and his workers did something that no one believed possible. We need info on that and the progressive agenda that he has forced. Perhaps something on the why and how of his willingness and ability to support Clinton at (IMO) just the right moment--not too soon, not too late, but just right... Perhaps a para on the email leaks...maybe. Go ahead and do as you see fit. I'll scream to high heaven on the talk page if I don't like something. :) Gandydancer (talk) 00:25, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- OK, I'll make it a point to get everything up to date and succinct. I also admire the way he has endorsed Clinton. Those who are seeing it as a capitulation don't understand his brand of incrementalism. He'll be all over the country making progressive campaign promises on her behalf until November. It will be interesting to see how that turns out when it's time to govern. HappyWanderer15 (talk) 22:52, 28 July 2016 (UTC)
- ...again, I wish I had time right now but I don't. In time I hope to see the article improved...even mainstream media is noting the historical significance of his ability to fund his campaign from small doners/ Chuck Todd noted that we will never know if he might have fared differently if the DNC had not worked against him. Other stuff in recap... For now, Gandy Gandydancer (talk) 01:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 21
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Prince Ea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Race. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:10, 21 September 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
Hello, HappyWanderer15. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
Hello, HappyWanderer15. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Famousbirthdays.com as a source
Hi HappyWanderer15. I noticed that you recently used famousbirthdays.com as a source for information in a biography article, Daniele Bolelli. Please note that there is general consensus that famousbirthdays.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for the inclusion of personal information in such articles. (See Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_153#Is_famousbirthdays.com_a_reliable_source_for_personal_information). If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 17:35, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
Fair enough. I didn’t think it was a great source either which is why I linked the second one that you left there as well. In the future I won’t use it even in tandem with others. Thanks for letting me know of the discussion that has taken place. HappyWanderer15 (talk) 02:28, 7 July 2018 (UTC) HappyWanderer15 (talk) 02:28, 7 July 2018 (UTC)
RfC: Social democracy
You might be interested in providing your insight at: Talk:Bernie Sanders#RfC: Social democracy. Cheers, HopsonRoad (talk) 19:42, 14 July 2018 (UTC)