User talk:Hazelhouse1988

Welcome!

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Lee Clark (footballer), have removed content without a good reason to do so. Content on Wikipedia should not be removed just because you disagree with it or because you think it's wrong, unless the claim is not verifiable. Instead, you should consider expanding the article with noteworthy and verifiable information of your own, citing reliable sources when you do so. If you'd like to experiment with the wiki's syntax, please do so in the sandbox rather than in articles. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Editing tutorial
Picture tutorial
How to write a great article
Naming conventions
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:

Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
Maintain a neutral point of view – this is one of Wikipedia's core policies.
Take particular care while adding biographical material about a living person to any Wikipedia page and follow Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons policy. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced with multiple reliable sources.
No edit warring or abuse of multiple accounts.
If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to do so.
Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject; doing so will result in your account or IP being blocked from editing.
Do not use talk pages as discussion or forum pages as Wikipedia is not a forum.

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Struway2 (talk) 20:36, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The worst thing i ever done getting involved in this embarrassing media outlet Scum the lot of you !!!! Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Lee Clark (footballer), you may be blocked from editing. Struway2 (talk) 20:45, 6 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Lee Clark (footballer), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 14:06, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

👍 Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 14:13, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Lee Clark (footballer), you may be blocked from editing. Struway2 (talk) 11:39, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want to appeal being blocked Its against my rights This page os not right Why do you say it is ? I want to be unblocked immediately Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 13:41, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

How do i get unblocked ? Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 14:57, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Key board warriors COWARDS !!!!! Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 19:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Clark

Hello, and thank you for your message, which arrived after I'd logged out for the night.

Please visit the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Football#Non-league managerial stats, re Lee Clark. cheers, Struway2 (talk) 09:48, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia articles are supposed to follow what the reliable sources say. And the sources in the article about Mr Clark's spell at Blyth Spartans describe him as manager: BBC report of his appointment and Blyth Spartans club site announcement of his departure. As does the club's announcement of his appointment: "Blyth Spartans are delighted to announce the appointment of former England International and Newcastle United midfielder Lee Clark as their new first team manager."

As to the Fulham 2000/01 playing stats, again, the standard stats sources all say 45 league matches: 11v11.com, Soccerbase and others. It appears that the one match he missed was against Norwich in January 2001: the BBC match report tells us that "Fulham's rather low-key performance showed how much they missed the absent Lee Clark." cheers, Struway2 (talk) 14:39, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I personally think there is a vendetta against Lee with his managerial Statistics as not all managers are given win % at this level. Obviously full time managers in this level but part time football Totally disagree Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 15:26, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Key board warrior Preventing people getting employment in current climate Mental Health discrimination etc Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 19:28, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hazelhouse1988, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Hazelhouse1988! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like ChamithN (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 7 February 2021 (UTC)

Why do i want to get involved in this embarrassing media outlet Absolute disgrace !!!! Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 19:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you are Mr Clark, or editing on his behalf

...you might want to read the page Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help, and see if any of the advice there will help resolve the issue. Struway2 (talk) 17:55, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SCUM !!!!! Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Clark

Why is it such a big thing for you Non- league should not count Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 18:07, 10 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

One could equally ask you the same question. Why are you so determined to remove properly cited, factually correct content? 2A00:23C6:C780:DA00:DC95:8960:57C9:4B38 (talk) 13:09, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Your recent editing history at Lee Clark (footballer) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Struway2 (talk) 13:41, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Lee Clark (footballer). RA0808 ^talk _contribs 20:08, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Lee Clark (footballer), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:09, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Keyboard warriors SCUM !!!!! Preventing individuals getting employment

Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 19:26, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Clark

Who are you too block anyone Busy !!!!! Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 21:29, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Lee Clark

Who are you Head of Wikipedia ? Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 21:30, 13 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

You have been blocked from editing the pages (Lee Clark (footballer) and Talk:Lee Clark (footballer)) for persistent disruptive editing. You are still able to edit any other page. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Black Kite (talk) 13:34, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I want unblocked immediately This is against my legal rights Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 13:42, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(a) No it isn't (b) Instructions on how to be unblocked are in the notice above. Black Kite (talk) 14:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Whoever you all are- you determination to keep this non league nonsense on this wiki page is preventing this person getting employment. Plus the fact serious mental health issues. Whatever your vendetta is & hatred of this individual is-its worked congratulations 👏⚽️ Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 11:46, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Why no reply to my previous statement Absolute disgraceful behaviour. Should be ashamed off yourselves YOU KEYBOARD WARRIORS Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 19:24, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hazelhouse1988 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

i have not been giving a chance as i believe the stats are wrong and should not be part of managerial stats Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 15:00, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You were given chances. You were warned and you chose to ignore the warnings. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 16:10, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So what do i have to do to be unblocked ? Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 16:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

What do i have to do to be unblocked Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 16:36, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The page linked in the template above explains it:

You, as a blocked editor, are responsible for convincing administrators:

that the block was not necessary to prevent damage or disruption (i.e., that the block violates our blocking policy); or:

that the block is no longer necessary because you understand what you are blocked for, you will not do it again, and you will make productive contributions instead;

You will primarily need to address the second point i.e. give an assurance that you will not repeat the disruptive editing for which you have been blocked -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:26, 14 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will not get involved in disruptive editing Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 16:28, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As it says on the page linked above, "To make an unblock request, copy the following text to the bottom of your user talk page: {{unblock|1=Insert your reason to be unblocked here ~~~~}}. Don't forget to insert your own reason to replace "Insert your reason to be unblocked here"." Be advised, though, that if you do manage to get unblocked and immediately go back to removing valid sourced content from the article on Lee Clark, you will very quickly be blocked again and this time it will definitely not be removed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 19:52, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for personal attacks and harassment. While editors are allowed (to an extent) to blow off steam post-block, what you have done is to return to Wikipedia several days after your block to make personal attacks repeatedly on this page and, when that didn't get you the attention you were looking for, here. This is unacceptable behaviour on a collaborative project and therefore I've extended your block site wide.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:19, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your information is so false its untrue Fake scumbags

Hazelhouse1988 (talk) 22:27, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 22:29, 25 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]