User talk:HelgaStick

Archives

This page has archives. Sections older than 30 days may be automatically archived by when more than 4 sections are present.

Changes on White House site

Greetings HelgaStick! In reference to your recent edits that I reverted on the Donald Trump bio, you may want to note that the article Social policy of Donald Trump has a rather detailed section dedicated to Trump's positions on LGBT issues. You may find that removal of such information from the White House web site is not synonymous with a lack of support or interest. Kind regards, — JFG ^talk 01:32, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Peale

Thanks for your recent edits to the Trump article. I wonder if you'd mind if we move the Peale stuff to the section on "Religious views"? It seems more relevant there than in the "Ancestry" section. Also, note that Peale is already mentioned in the "Family" section. Cheers.Anythingyouwant (talk) 17:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seems good to me. HelgaStick (talk) 17:40, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, well, it would be easiest if you do it, but I can probably do it tomorrow, maybe leaving out the books Peale wrote (we don't even describe most of Trump's own books).Anythingyouwant (talk) 17:46, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will move what I have written in that section to the "Religious views" section, and make a new section on the talk page. HelgaStick (talk) 17:49, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done (talk page). HelgaStick (talk) 17:59, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Anythingyouwant (talk) 18:00, 18 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/HelgaStick, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

SmartSE (talk) 18:22, 15 August 2017 (UTC) [reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of GringisMan (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · logs · block log · arb · rfc · lta · SPI · cuwiki) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. SmartSE (talk) 12:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

SmartSE and Sro23, I've noted HelgaStick's sock behavior before, and I'm sure that this is not the editor's first time socking, but, unfortunately, I cannot yet solidly tie this editor to a previous account. Anyway, thanks for catching one form of this editor's socking. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 06:30, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]