User talk:Highyack07

Welcome!

Hello, Highyack07, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Onmusic, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Computerwiz908 | Talk 13:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Onmusic

A tag has been placed on Onmusic requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Computerwiz908 | Talk 13:04, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Highyack07. You have new messages at Computerwiz908's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Computerwiz908 | Talk 13:56, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

May 2009

Please stop. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Acroterion _(talk) 02:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not move your user page and talk page into article space. Acroterion _(talk) 02:15, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Andy Salmon

A tag has been placed on Andy Salmon requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Terrillja _talk 16:27, 3 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:British+Forces+Begin+Their+Official+Withdrawal+rcGtf5IoOykl.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:British+Forces+Begin+Their+Official+Withdrawal+rcGtf5IoOykl.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:37, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page You Suck has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 20:23, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Elvis Presley. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Elvis Presley was changed by Highyack07 (u) (t) replacing entire content with something else on 2009-05-08T20:27:19+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 20:27, 8 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Flagnod

A tag has been placed on Flagnod, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Alexkin (talk) 16:48, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Kevin Cash has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Shlomke (talk) 14:22, 1 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Fvaritek vlg 6p.widec.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Fvaritek vlg 6p.widec.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, we also need to know the terms of the license that the copyright holder has published the file under, usually done by adding a licensing tag. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged files may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the file will be deleted 48 hours after 02:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ww2censor (talk) 02:01, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Trot Nixon has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:50, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Home run. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:53, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Shelley Duncan. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 23:55, 8 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Reggie Jackson. J.delanoy ^gabs _adds 00:00, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Mike Glavine Award

I have nominated Mike Glavine Award, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike Glavine Award. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Nancy ^talk 15:39, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mike Glavine Award

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Mike Glavine Award, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Joe Chill (talk) 19:51, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. Blocked for 48 hours for creating the hoax page Mike Glavine Award after the above warnings. Any more vandalism after the block expires, and you can expect to be blocked indefinitely. NawlinWiki (talk) 19:55, 14 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Feb 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created have been considered disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. Thank you. Redirecting Ronald Reagan in his infobox or any other article to your user page and insinuating you were his Vice President (as you did on February 14, 2010) is not advised. Morenooso (talk) 06:35, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Any admin reviewing this talkpage might to take a look at this userpage. There is a lot of "stuff" there that probably is not appropriate on a userpage. Morenooso (talk) 07:01, 16 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you will be blocked from editing. Canterbury Tail talk 15:59, 17 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

For continuing to vandalise others user pages,creating inappropriate pages, and for being a non-contributive vandalism only account, you have been blocked indefinitely.

This user has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia.
(see: block log • contributions • deleted contributions • autoblocks)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been in mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Highyack07 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 01:06, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Bella B.JPG

Thank you for uploading File:Bella B.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MGA73 (talk) 10:16, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please Unblock Me!!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Highyack07 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello. It has been very long since I have committed sock puppetry on Wikipedia. I have learned my ways. I ask to be given one more chance. If I blow it, please, just delete my account! When I created multiple accounts I was unaware of that creating more than one account was illegal and I never meant to do anything bad with my second account. I have learned my ways with vandalism too. When I got this account, I was unaware of Wikipedia's importance. I now am in LOVE with Wikipedia. Please give me my account back. I beg you!!

Decline reason:

I think that by "very long time since I have committed sock puppetry", you mean "ten minutes before you posted this request", and by "my second account", you mean "your eighth account". TN X Man 03:26, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's swell to hear, certainly. What sorts of articles did you plan on editing, if you don't mind my asking? - Vianello (Talk) 23:27, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

To Vianello

Well, nothing in particular. Basically, I would just like my basic Wikipedia freedoms back. Also, I would like to ask why Wikipedia does not let users have more than one account.

Let me quote the relevant bits of Wikipedia:SOCK to answer that: "Wikipedia editors are generally expected to edit using only one (preferably registered) account. Using a single account maintains editing continuity, improves accountability, and increases community trust, which helps to build long-term stability for the encyclopedia. While there are some valid reasons for maintaining multiple accounts on the project, the use of multiple accounts to deceive other editors, disrupt discussions, distort consensus, avoid sanctions, or otherwise violate community standards – sock puppetry – is forbidden.... Editors who want to use more than one account for some valid reason should provide links between them on the respective user pages (see below), with an explanation of the purpose of each account or of the relationship between them. If so desired, the user and user talk pages from one account can be redirected to the other. Editors who use unlinked alternative accounts, or who edit as an IP separate from their account, should carefully avoid any crossover on articles or topics, because even innocuous activities such as copy editing, wikifying, or linking might be considered sock puppetry in some cases and innocuous intentions will not usually serve as an excuse."

The above-linked article explains it in more detail. - Vianello (Talk) 06:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tnxman307

Listen. I don't even know who the hell this Jeff guy is!!!!! I was blocked like two years ago. I admit using multiple accounts, but it was only so I could have another page to write an article on. I didn't do any of the shit that makes having two or more accounts bad. I had like two or three accounts three years ago. I promise I did nothing bad with them. WHO THE HELL IS JEFF????

To Vianello

Thank you very much for your explanation. I promise that nothing wrong was ever done or intended with those accounts. Would you please be kind enough to unblock me???? If or if not, thank you!

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Highyack07 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I just want to edit my user page. WHO THE HELL IS JEFF????

Decline reason:

You may not. Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 01:16, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.