User talk:Hitesh2617

June 2019

Hello, I'm Serols. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Arvind Singh Mewar— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Serols (talk) 14:19, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Udaipur. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Udaipur was changed by Hitesh2617 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.900158 on 2019-06-03T14:32:27+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 14:32, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Moti Magri

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit that introduces praise or promotional language to the Moti Magri article. On Wikipedia, we adhere to a neutral point of view (NPOV) and avoid promotional language or puffery. Please read the NPOV policy page, as well as this page of language to avoid to better understand how to expand this article in a style suitable to an encyclopedia. If you have questions, please see the Help Desk page. Thank you! Balon Greyjoy (talk) 14:36, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Fateh Sagar Lake, you may be blocked from editing. Serols (talk) 14:44, 3 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hitesh2617, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Hitesh2617! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:12, 3 June 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Atheist Krishna

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Atheist Krishna, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Largoplazo (talk) 23:30, 8 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Atheist Krishna

Hello Hitesh2617,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Atheist Krishna for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Akhiljaxxn (talk) 11:28, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anand Kumar (IAS)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anand Kumar (IAS), requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement of energynext.in/2017/07/anand-kumar-joins-mnre-as-secretary. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GSS (talk|c|em) 15:34, 20 June 2019 (UTC) Whpq[reply]

File permission problem with File:Picture Amitabh Chaudhry.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Picture Amitabh Chaudhry.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 11:11, 24 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Whpq

Hey, This content is given by the PR team of Amitabh Chaudhry. There should not be any problem as such.

Whpq

I have forwarded the permission mail to permissions-en@wikimedia.org give by the team of Amitabh Chaudhry to you. Hope it's fine now.

June 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, articles should not be moved, as you did to Anand Kumar IAS, without good reason. They should have a name that is both accurate and intuitive. Wikipedia has some guidelines in place to help with this. Generally, a page should only be moved to a new title if the current name doesn't follow these guidelines. Also, if a page move is being discussed, consensus needs to be reached before anybody moves the page. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Masum Reza^📞 06:45, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't move pages by yourself anymore instead please have a look at requested move. Masum Reza^📞 06:51, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

^📞 anand kumar ( topic of article) itself asked me to move this page to anand kumar IAS. I always follow guidlines. BTW thanks for the intimation. (Redacted) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hitesh2617 (talk • contribs)

I get that. But your client should know that his page on Wikipedia isn't his. He doesn't own that page. Wikipedia is not for self-advertising. Masum Reza^📞 09:38, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted) He is not client. I am contributor here, contributes on many topics. i will take care of the things.

Really appreciate your guidance. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hitesh2617 (talk • contribs)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Hitesh2617. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Masum Reza^📞 09:29, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Just a question are you paid to edit Wikipedia? Masum Reza^📞 09:35, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted)

No, not at all. are you serious ? This is my interest ? i do it daily. i do it daily. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hitesh2617 (talk • contribs)

I love to give my free time to wiki.. what are you saying ? (Redacted)

(Redacted) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hitesh2617 (talk • contribs)

I will take care of the guidelines. Thanks for helping me out. I am learning and i will ping you if i need your help. (Redacted) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hitesh2617 (talk • contribs)

Please refrain from copying my signature. (Please sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes like this: ~~~~.) The correct procedure to ping me is by adding {{u|Masumrezarock100}} to your message, and signing it. Masum Reza^📞 09:56, 27 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Masumrezarock100 sure brother. Thank you for helping me.

Given your company's^{(admin only link)} industry, your claim that you are not being paid to edit Wikipedia is somewhat difficult to believe, especially give this statement. Would you like to reconsider your answer, or provide a more thorough explanation of your relationship with Anand Kumar and the other people you have written about?

Yunshui

I declare that i dont know the anand kumar. I was asked in public group to correct its title because there was an error in ther article. Thanks! He is secetry of a govt ministry so i am suggesting such tag not suitable for such govt beaurocrate. (Redacted)

You are directly contradicting what you said here. How was Anand Kumar able to ask you to move the article if you do not know him? Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:50, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Incidentally, if you sign your messages with the signature of another user again, you will be blocked for disruptive editing. If you wish to get the attention of another editor, use the {{ping}} template. Copying their signature as though it is your own is confusing, offensive and forbidden by policy. Yunshui ^雲 _水 13:52, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I said it because since i am new to wikkipedia, i did not have any idea that it will result in such things. Someone from a wikkipedia leaning public group asked me change the header. I was scared because moderator asked me so i said in flow.

Final decision is upto you my senior. Have a good day.

Can you please disclose who asked you to edit Amitabh Chaudhry? GSS (talk|c|em) 15:42, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also, do you know user Prerna005 and Pooja.Shirsat? GSS (talk|c|em) 16:00, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@GSS: Those two accounts belong to employees of Chaudhry's company; I've blocked them both for UPE and advertising. Hitesh doesn't work for Axis, his employer is a marketing agency. There's no direct relationship between the accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 16:59, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am blocking this account since it's clear that you are not being honest with us. You have said here that you are working with Amitabh Chaudhry's PR department, and you have been continually evasive about your relationships with the subjects of the articles you have created. I find it much more likely that these individuals are employing your marketing firm than that you contacted a person's PR department off your own bat simply to obtain a photograph. Yunshui ^雲 _水 17:04, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

No one asked me to edit, I uploaded picture by my own but it got rejected so i asked honor to give me rights to upload the picture. I Don’t know any of these. What do u think wikkipedia is rocket since that people will pay me for editing. This is really disappointing. No ofense. Sad to leave this platforms. Dont know how someone can prove himself right here.

Someome in wikkipedia learning telegram group

Hi, Someone is wikkipedia learning group on telegram put the query on wikipedia to update the same publicly. Hope this helps you.

You can check my past contributions. I update on various stuff rest is upto you. Masumrezarock100 Hitesh2617 (talk) 09:23, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for engaging in undisclosed paid editing, in violation of Wikipedia's Terms of Use.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Yunshui ^雲 _水 17:06, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hitesh2617 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, i am not into paid edit8ing, this is final time i am telling everyone that i don't know any of these. when i created my 1st article on wikki. i shared it with my friends and in wikkipedia learning groups. There was a someone who asked to edit the name of the page, he/she may know him - i dont know. Its ok i am leaving this platform coz of i am blocked - Though this is not fair. I don't have relation with any of these. I have edited hundred of pages. bye bye guys :( Hitesh2617 (talk) 18:19, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 18:46, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hitesh2617 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I may be violated the term and condition but i did it un-intentionally and i was not being paid. I don't even know about it but i really want to keep on using wikipedia. humble request to unblock.

Decline reason:

I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time. Per the discussion on this page, it is clear you have engaged in undeclared paid editing. Your answers have not been not been responsive and in fact your story has changed over time. Please review your options at WP:GAB. -- Dloh cier ekim 19:27, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gunit Chadha (September 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Just a CV

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gunit Chadha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Gunit Chadha, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 17:31, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gunit Chadha

Hello, Hitesh2617. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gunit Chadha".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Ə XPLICIT 09:13, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]