User talk:Hoaeter

October 2018

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Abyssinian people. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 23:13, 2 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Abyssinian people. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. Turtlewong (talk) 02:18, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Oromo people. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Turtlewong (talk) 02:22, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Tigre people. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Turtlewong (talk) 02:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:43, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Hoaeter, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

——SerialNumber54129 14:21, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Long-term issues at Habesha peoples. Thank you. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 01:27, 17 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock and Confession

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Hoaeter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Northeast African Edit-a-thon Conference Members (Apparently there is a new Wikipedia rule that states that all Edit-a-thon participants, people with similar ideas, or similar topic interests are considered Wikipedia:Meat puppetry and Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry violators. Edit-a-thons are now considered Troll farms. Here are the account names of most of our members: User:EthiopianEritrean User:Eritrea123123 User:EthiopianHabesha User:Soupforone User:Middayexpress User:Otakrem User:Zekenyan User:CrumpPlint User:Duqsene User:SharabSalam User:FastInjera User:MfactDr User:LettaTulu User:Hailefida User:Alazar Abay User:Gembres User:Maammee User:Ethiopia12345 User:Oromia Media Network User:OromoHabesha User:¨YAREDABIY¨ User:Habeshan negus User:Jai selassié User:Bahiru Altaye User:Tthelpfuluser User:Historicalchannel User:Leulw User:Warsai1994 User:HoAHabesha User:Hoaeter User:Solomonnebai User:Meseley u User:Tkerazragi User:Gubrya User:Yodit Tesfaye Habtemariam User:Wadaad User:Abyssinia Lion User:Sonofsem User:ZeraYacob User:LencaOromo User:Samuel sheba User:AbysinniaGuard User:Abelhilemichael User:HagereETH User:Caleb Mulugeta User:Habeshawoman User:Semayawit User:EthioWikiHelper User:Melakuweb User:Towfik.Abdallah User:ወዲ ናቅፋ, probably more that we lost record of. Hoaeter (talk) 1:51 pm, Today (UTC−5)

Decline reason:

This request doesn't address the main reason behind your block, which is that you were adding linkspam. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:14, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

@Rosguill:

What do you mean by linkspam? Are you talink about the sources that I cite? Do I cite sources too much, do we all cite sources too much too? Hoaeter (talk) 19:22, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Probbably the reason for the block were the mass aditions of Habesha Union [ሐበሻ] . “What Do You Mean by Habesha? — A Look at the Habesha Identity (P.s./t: It’s Very Vague, Confusing, & Misunderstood) | @habesha_union.” Academia, 1 Oct. 2018. under Fruther Reading in ~30 articles in October 2020. Victor Schmidt (talk) 19:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That was a valid sources and read more section, for these various Wikipedia articles because the topics are all interconnected. Hoaeter (talk) 19:30, 25 September 2020 (UTC) @Gyrofrog: @Doug Weller: @Drmies: @Austronesier: @Only:[reply]

It's a blog post, not a reliable source. At one point, a citation was fabricated to make this blog post appear as though it had appeared in an academic journal. Even aside from that, any unblock request (from any of the affiliated accounts) will also have to address some serious WP:BLP, WP:NPA and WP:OWH infringements made along the way via various sockpuppets. -- Gyrofrog (talk) 11:01, 26 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]