User talk:Honorable gentleman

June 2016

Hello, I'm Jfeise. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to University of Northern Virginia has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. jfeise (talk) 07:51, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. ElKevbo (talk) 12:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at University of Northern Virginia shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. jfeise (talk) 23:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting misleading information on the University of Northern Virginia Page: It was formerly accredited by the Accrediting Council for Independent Colleges and Schools (ACICS) from 2003-2008,(please check source Ref1 Page A30) Insisting on writing that it was unaccredited is misleading and false statement and contradicts the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia reference source document (Ref 1) Page 30). Why are you insisting on doing this ? what would you benefit ? We are trying to make this website an accurate tool for presenting internet users with correct and accurate information while maintaining neutrality and good ethics. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Honorable gentleman (talk • contribs) 04:45, June 8, 2016‎

Who is "we"? ElKevbo (talk) 10:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We the people who defend the Truth whatever it takes and protecting the rights of others.

May I ask who appointed you as "defender of the Truth"? Isn't it mighty arrogant to claim that you are the only "defender of the Truth?"

The question of who is "we" still stands. Please answer it without this "defender of the Truth" hyperbole. Thank you. jfeise (talk) 06:44, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ElKevbo (talk) 10:47, 8 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

University of Northern Virginia

The mention of being accredited is mentioned in the article. Its just not in the lead section since the university was unaccredited during their busiest years. Outside of that, if you wish to make a case, do it on the page for Talk:University of Northern Virginia. LionMans Account (talk) 03:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]