User talk:Howardchu

Archives

no archives yet (create)

This page has archives. Sections may be automatically archived by .

References

Here are a few good links for references:

Rob.au comment.

You shouldn't touch anyone's comments whether it's a typo or not, You may want to read this Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Others' comments. Bidgee (talk) 04:42, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

What are you referring to? Really? Can you please show me, thank you. {Howardchu (talk) 04:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

Just trying to help out. It's not a warning jut some infromation you may not have known[1].

Below is from Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Others' comments

It is not necessary to bring talk pages to publishing standards, so there is no need to correct typing errors, grammar, etc. It tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Do not strike out the comments of other editors without their permission.

Never edit someone's words to change their meaning, even on your own talk page. Editing others' comments is sometimes allowed, but you should exercise caution in doing so. Some examples of appropriately editing others' comments:

If you have their permission

Bidgee (talk) 04:50, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, no, you've misunderstood my question... I'm politely asking you what exactly I've done / altered the rob.au comment, rather asking you to quote me the guidelines I've read ;-) {Howardchu (talk) 04:54, 29 July 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

Okay, it's a honest mistake when I was editing my comment. I've mistakenly edited rob.au's comments as well during the process. Really. {Howardchu (talk) 05:00, 29 July 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

No problem. I thought it would be best to tell you then rather get a warning for it from another editor. Bidgee (talk) 05:02, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for everything. I've notified Rob.au about the incident... [2] {Howardchu (talk) 05:13, 29 July 2008 (UTC)}[reply]

Just for the record, no concerns at all from my side... even if you had done it deliberately, I'd have considered that a good faith edit to an obvious typo, even though Bidgee is correct. Thanks anyway. :) -- Rob.au (talk) 10:01, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (File:XxxHOLiC.jpg)

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:XxxHOLiC.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Zoo Fari 04:53, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Howardchu. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Howardchu. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]