User talk:Hrhadam

Please do not use talk pages such as Talk:Sigmund Freud for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 21:22, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Freud

You wrote on the Freud talk page: "If its not, its a fitting tribute to Freud in itself". How does that improve the article? Please explain what such a statement adds to the article on Freud. Would the article be less valuable without that comment? And please read WP:TALK entirely before responding. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 15:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"please don't waste my time": Same here.

"I care not enough about Freud to really spend any real time on the article": That's obvious, which is why I left the above message about using the Talk page for chat. Ward3001 (talk) 15:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks and threats

With regard to your comments on User talk:Ward3001: Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks will lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Ward3001 (talk) 21:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to User talk:Ward3001 could give editors of Wikipedia the impression that you may consider "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that this is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's rules and policies on civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. Ward3001 (talk) 21:10, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop

Stop blanking references from the LL Cool J article. It's vandalism. Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 18:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Are you going to respond to me, or go quietly into the night? It wasn't me, sir. If you revert something and the user who made the original edit doesn't revert it back, you're free to move on with your life -- edit articles, not user talk pages, and we can all coexist nicely. Hrhadam (talk) 22:19, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

~~What spin are you trying to play?~~ I added a reference to an article and then you deleted it for no reason and without any kind of edit summary that said why. I think people are allowed to question this because its freakin suspicious. And I have a life outside this website (like you who haven't been back here for 2 days either), so lay off the "are you gonna respond to me". If you made a mistake then just say so and everyone will say "fine" and forget about it. Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 06:49, 25 May 2009 (UTC) <EDIT> 1. I'm female, if you keep saying "gentlemen" I'm gonna say "who walked in?". 2. I just now saw this [1] but it's to the discussion after it was archived so I did not see it. Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 07:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Cool sir, thanks! Hrhadam (talk) 08:33, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your behaviour

Hi. It seems that no-one has yet notified you, but there is currently an ongoing thread about your behaviour here. It seems that many of your edits as of late have either violated core Wikipedia policies, such as no personal attacks, or have been pure vandalism, such as removing valid references from articles. Combined with this, threatening edit wars in edit summaries is also unacceptable. Please consider helping in a constructive manner by agreeing to edit in accordance with policy. You may consider taking a time-out to reflect on your actions, but either way, if you do decide to continue editing, please note that further disruptive behaviour will result in a block. Consider this a final warning. C.U.T.K.D ^{T | C} 06:59, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I trust by now you've all read my responses to this; I'll remove none of this from my page, of course. Not my style. Also note that my "war" with the much-maligned Ward3001 lasted for about 24 hours, going on about 2 years ago :) Cheers all, thanks for stopping by, hope we can get this sorted! Hrhadam (talk) 08:48, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pioneercourthouse

Pioneercourthouse (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Why would anyone ban him? Have you even bothered to read the relevant material?! The user is evading blocks in order to implicate and harass others. That's more than enough reason for a ban.— Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 22:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sarcasm :) Also, wasnt referring to pioneercourthouse Hrhadam (talk) 23:40, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Um

For someone who supposedly wants to "get on with editing articles" and "not waste time posting to talk pages" you sure like to drag out personal vendettas. I thought we had moved on but instead you're making personal attacks days after the fact. Based on the pathetic excuses you've given, you were incompetent enough to allow someone else to compromise your account and that person blanked a reference from an article. Personally, I think you blanked it deliberately and got caught. So, you're either a deliberate vandal or a first-rate moron. Things like this [2] won't win you any admirers, Clowny Clown Clown. Also, WP:Dick. -- Iggy pop goes the weasel (talk) 06:56, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

HAHAHHA. Yeah you're right, man. Sorry you've retired from Wikipedia. Interesting that you had problems with "so many" people in such a "short time." Maybe its your personality. I've been doing this for years and you were only the 2nd person to have issue with me, and the first is someone who has about 75 pages of hate mail on his user page. :) Hrhadam (talk) 20:37, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

August 2009

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Talk:Lady Gaga. Thank you. POKERdance ^talk/contribs 00:13, 8 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I did no such thing, I added a very valid question to the talk page. The subject I'd asked about has been debated on several fan pages, and was fueled by the artist herself. Please do a bit of research before hastily adding a derisive reprimand to my page. Just another person who has a talk page full of people complaining about him, bans/near-bans from admins, etc, complaining about me, a major contributor to Wikipedia via editing as well as cash donations. Everyone that has ever complained about me [which I can count on one hand] has wound up banned or "retired" after a few short weeks here. Hilarious. NRN. Hrhadam (talk) 08:31, 19 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]