User talk:Hullu poro

Welcome!

Hello, Hullu poro, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Aboutmovies 07:19, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:TurbinePotsdam.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:TurbinePotsdam.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 09:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for covering women's football. Punkmorten (talk) 09:55, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Germany Invitation

Hello, Hullu poro! I'd like to call your attention to the WikiProject Germany and the German-speaking Wikipedians' notice board. I hope their links, sub-projects and discussions are interesting and even helpful to you. If not, I hope that new ones will be.

--Zeitgespenst (talk) 23:56, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Can you help me?

Done – for more information see {{Infobox Musician Awards}}. Regards, Canniba loki 16:15, 20 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much!!! --Hullu poro (talk) 08:05, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You're welcome! =) Canniba loki 20:13, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Amon Amarth discography

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Amon Amarth discography, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Content forking

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Canniba loki 20:27, 23 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Merging of 2008 Cup final into 2008 cup article

Hi Hullo poro!

I've recently stumbled upon your article about the 2008 DFB-Pokal final. Do you plan to expand on this article? Because right now I think it would be better to merge this article with the 2008 DFB-Pokal article, thus keeping this information together instead of clustering it. I know that this is done different for the FA cup, but personally I can't see a very detailed coverage for DFB-Pokal finals done anytime in the nearer future. If you oppose or just want to share your thoughts join the discussion at the WikiProjectGermanfootball. Regards, OdinFK (talk) 07:17, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Hertha BSC Berlin managers

I have nominated Category:Hertha BSC Berlin managers (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. ClubOranje^T 00:44, 6 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of Volbeat members

The article List of Volbeat members has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Offers nothing that cannot be incorporated into the main article.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Walter Görlitz (talk) 16:25, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of 2007–08 1. FFC Turbine Potsdam season for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2007–08 1. FFC Turbine Potsdam season is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2007–08 1. FFC Turbine Potsdam season until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 17:11, 23 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Jessica Wich

The article Jessica Wich has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 11:10, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Carolin Schiewe

The article Carolin Schiewe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 11:14, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Peggy Nietgen

The article Peggy Nietgen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

fails WP:NFOOTY

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mightytotems (talk) 11:15, 19 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Franziska Hagemann for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Franziska Hagemann is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Franziska Hagemann until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:39, 26 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]