User talk:IThoughtTheGlueWasMilk

February 2020

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lesbian erotica has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lesbian erotica was changed by IThoughtTheGlueWasMilk (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950424 on 2020-02-08T21:43:03+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:43, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Hooker, Oklahoma. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. -- TruthToBeSpoken (talk) 21:59, 8 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Super Bowl, you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 10:49, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Materialscientist-how was the Super Bowl edit vandalism? It isn’t untrue or offensive, and more importantly, why was it necessary for removal? Smh... IThoughtTheGlueWasMilk (talk) 15:29, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to God. Mr. Vernon (talk) 03:11, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ian.thomson (talk) 04:05, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

That isn’t vandalism. Did you even read my review explanation? I suppose the structure of the sentence could have been improved, but isn’t Wikipedia about making bold edits? IThoughtTheGlueWasMilk (talk) 04:34, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The best of your edits were the level of opinionated that suggests that you either don't know or don't care what an encyclopedia is. That's ignoring downright stupid stuff like your edit to God. Ian.thomson (talk) 06:52, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]