User talk:I use Nookipedia

February 2024

Hello, I'm Ferret. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Tom Nook have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. -- ferret (talk) 16:36, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, what I said is right because everybody on social media, youtube, and school thinks that. So you should punish every single person on wikipedia instead. I use Nookipedia (talk) 16:54, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. -- ferret (talk) 16:40, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I use Nookipedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I only use wikipedia to change wrong edits. This is crazy that they banned me for typing in something right. Also, I am with this group of people at school who are against vandalism. And I play animal crossing as lot, so I am right about what I changed tom nook's page. But if you don't belive me, I promise to never make bad edits again. Also, if you unblock me I will check over all animal crossing pages and see if they are correct. Also, isn't is unfair to get permanently blocked from editing any wiki page just because of one or two sentences I typed that was fairly correct? I use Nookipedia (talk) 17:19, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

On the one hand, you claim all of your edits were right. On the other hand, you claim you'll stop making bad edits if you are unblocked. These two statements directly contradict each other. Yamla (talk) 17:40, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I use Nookipedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, I am here to appeal again. I am right on the Tom nook page. A trillion people can prove it. I play animal crossing every day. Also, getting blocked on everything forever on wiki just because of one or two extra sentences on the page is too unfair. My edit said that: Although Tom Nook is a helpful caracter, players think he is bad because he rips off too many bells from players. Search up: Tom Nook memes right now and see why I am right about editing the Tom Nook page. Can you unblock me now? I found an error on one of the wiki pages that I definitely need to edit! Also, I went to nookipedia, the animal crossing wiki, and it proves me. Go to nookipedia, and search up Tom Nook. And read the article. I use Nookipedia (talk) 17:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Your edit filter log shows your intent to vandalize Wikipedia. No thank you. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 18:32, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I use Nookipedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am so sorry. That was the first time I editied wikipedia so I didn't know how to edit properly. Now I watched a tutorial and learned how to edit correctly. Sorry for that. I will stop that. Can you unblock me now? I promise I won't do that agian.🥺🙏🥺🙏🥺🙏🥺🙏🥺🙏🥺🙏🥺🙏🥺🙏🥺🙏🥺🙏🥺🙏

Decline reason:

Duplicate request. 331dot (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You say, "I went to nookipedia, the animal crossing wiki, and it proves me". Do you understand which policy makes this completely inappropriate? Please name the policy and convince us you won't ever use nookipedia as a source. --Yamla (talk) 19:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I won't use nookipedia again. It breaks the "Not part of the encyclopedia" rule. I will stop.

There is no such rule and this is not why you should avoid nookipedia. It's very clear you simply don't understand Wikipedia and need to remain blocked. --Yamla (talk) 19:30, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

SORRY. Sorry. Sorry. I won't vandalize. and It breaks the "no vandalism rule". I under stand now.

No. WP:CIR clearly applies. Wikipedia isn't the place for you at this time, I strongly suggest you withdraw your open unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 19:37, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's WP:RS, by the way. I strongly oppose any unblock of this user. --Yamla (talk) 19:40, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I promise I will stop. I fully understand. Please? I use Nookipedia (talk) 19:50, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I declined at UTRS, so I can't here. Recommend WP:SO. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 20:01, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I use Nookipedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey there!

I hope this message finds you well. I'm writing to appeal the block placed on my Wikipedia account. I understand that there may have been an issue with my recent edits, and I sincerely apologize if any of my contributions violated Wikipedia's policies or guidelines.

I'm a passionate contributor to Wikipedia and value the collaborative spirit of the platform. I strive to adhere to Wikipedia's principles of neutrality, verifiability, and reliability in all of my edits.

I'm committed to learning from any mistakes that may have led to the block and am eager to rectify the situation. I'm more than willing to engage in constructive dialogue with administrators and other community members to address any concerns and ensure that my contributions meet Wikipedia's standards.

I kindly request that you reconsider the block on my account and give me the opportunity to continue contributing positively to the Wikipedia community. Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards,

Me.I use Nookipedia (talk) 20:05, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Chatbot written requests are not accepted. 331dot (talk) 20:31, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

I use Nookipedia (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hey there,

I wish you are doing properly. I'm achieving out because I ran into a chunk of a snag with my Wikipedia account. It seems it were given blocked recently, and I'm genuinely hoping we can kind matters out.

I absolutely get that there could have been some troubles with a number of the stuff I've been enhancing currently. Looking back, I can see where I might've stepped over the road with a few things, and for that, I'm definitely sorry.

Thing is, I love being a part of the Wikipedia community. It's kind of come to be a piece of a passion for me, you know? I've always attempted to stick to the rules, preserve things neutral, and ensure the whole thing's respectable. But hey, we all reduce to rubble every so often, proper?

I'm certainly eager to research from whatever mistakes I made and get returned on track. I'm greater than glad to chat with you folks, undergo any education or some thing's had to make sure I'm on the equal page as all people else.

Could you do me a strong and deliver my account any other shot? I promise I'll do my exceptional to make matters proper and make a contribution definitely like I constantly have.

Thanks a gaggle for hearing me out. Looking forward to hopefully getting returned inside the swing of factors quickly.

Best,

me

Decline reason:

Chatbot written requests are not accepted. -- ferret (talk) 22:26, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I have revoked talk page access due to rather exceptional evidence of WP:CIR and to prevent any further time being wasted here. --Yamla (talk) 21:28, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

Email access revoked. You are free to use UTRS once your ban there expires. --Yamla (talk) 00:28, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't email me further from your socks. -- ferret (talk) 18:15, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]