User talk:IcedOutDevil2
Hi - not sure this will be productive, but I’ll give it a try.
- Wikipedia:Conflict of interest - If you are related to the late general, you shouldn’t be editing the page directly due to a Conflict of Interest;
- Wikipedia:Neutral point of view - In this case, martyrdom is a subjective opinion, death is a fact. We shouldn’t, and won’t, be describing the general’s death as martyrdom as we write in a Neutral way;
- New user - are you actually a new user with only three edits on Wikipedia? We give new users considerable latitude on here, but the terminology you use in your edit summary, “notified admin for vandalism”, suggests a familiarity with our processes.
If you are related to the late general, my sympathy for your loss. But that doesn’t give you latitude to impose your own point of view on a Wikipedia page. KJP1 (talk) 12:07, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
- Unless you stop, you will likely end up blocked. KJP1 (talk) 12:15, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
Edit warring
[edit]Hi - as KJP1 has noted above, you are edit warring at that page, which is not acceptable. I have applied protection to the page to prevent that - if you persist with the edit warring, you will end up being blocked. Please also take a moment to read MOS:EUPH. Best Girth Summit (blether) 12:37, 26 November 2022 (UTC)