User talk:Iceveela
Welcome!
Hello, Iceveela, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Knitting and crochet during the civil war, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted.
You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.
Thank you.
There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}}
on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- Your first article
- Biographies of living persons
- How to write a great article
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Help pages
- Tutorial
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! —Largo Plazo (talk) 06:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Knitting and crochet during the civil war
[edit]A tag has been placed on Knitting and crochet during the civil war requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Largo Plazo (talk) 06:39, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
The article Knitting and crochet during the civil war has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Beeblebrox (talk) 10:09, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Knitting and crochet during the civil war
[edit]I have nominated Knitting and crochet during the civil war, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knitting and crochet during the civil war. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:28, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Knitting and crochet during the civil war
[edit]I have nominated Knitting and crochet during the civil war, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Knitting and crochet during the civil war. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —Largo Plazo (talk) 18:29, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]Message added 03:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
—Largo Plazo (talk) 03:55, 11 January 2010 (UTC)
History of knitting
[edit]Hi Iceveela. To highlight my comments, that article isn't suitable, but... related areas you could work on are 1860s in fashion, History of knitting, and the yet-to-be-created Women in the American Civil War (a counterpart of Women in the American Revolution). There are sources covering this topic that you could use:[1][2]. To answer your general point, please read Wikipedia:No original research and Wikipedia:Verifiability to understand why editors insist on sources being used. p.s. Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes after your comments, i.e. ~~~~. Fences&Windows 04:05, 14 January 2010 (UTC)
Articles for deletion nomination of Controversial pseudosciences
[edit]I have nominated Controversial pseudosciences, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Controversial pseudosciences. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:14, 26 August 2010 (UTC)