User talk:Icoa9125

January 2016

Hello, I'm BoxOfChickens. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to David Bowie (1967 album) have been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 21:28, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lodger (album). Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 21:37, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to David Bowie entries described as "vandalism"

Hi Box of Chickens,

I am confused by having edits described as "vandalism". I am wondering what makes you draw such a conclusion. The edits I made are drawn from the authoritative and exhaustively researched Chris O'Learry source Rebel Rebel and https://bowiesongs.wordpress.com/, which has obviously been used by others for sourcing recording dates in the Wikipedia Bowie entries. If I have approached the process incorrectly, apologies, as I am doing so for the first time and would appreciate some advice on this score. Thanks, icoa9125 Icoa9125 (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Oops. I didn't see the summary on the second edit. However, on both edits, you still need to cite the source you used. BoxOfChickens (talk · contribs · CSD/ProD log) 21:59, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I see. Sorry about that.Icoa9125 (talk) 22:10, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]