User talk:Ilyes toon

GeGeGe no Kitarō (movie 2007) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, GeGeGe no Kitarō (movie 2007), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:37, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:GeGeGe no Kitarō (movie 2007)

Hello, Ilyes toon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:GeGeGe no Kitarō (movie 2007), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:02, 22 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:GeGeGe no Kitarō (movie 2007)

Hello, Ilyes toon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "GeGeGe no Kitarō".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 13:20, 22 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Chipmunkdavis. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. CMD (talk) 14:35, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Edit-warring at Egyptian mongoose

Consider this a formal warning. If you do not stop adding either a) low-quality, superfluous images or b) unsourced, WP:OR claims to the article, you will be reported for disruptive editing. This article is not the forum for your bad holiday images, nor for extrapolations based on private sightings or hearsay. Stick to high-quality sources and image material please. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 18:59, 9 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Egyptian mongoose, you may be blocked from editing. It has been repeatedly explained to you that Wikipedia does not accept content that can not be referenced to reliable sources. This is a policy, and not subject to debate. If you insert unsourced material once more, I will report you to an administrator and recommend that you are blocked for willfully ignoring basic sourcing requirements. --Elmidae (talk · contribs) 07:57, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

You have been blocked from editing from certain pages (Egyptian mongoose) for a period of 1 month for adding unsourced information and editwarring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ϣere SpielChequers 21:29, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Stoat, you may be blocked from editing. Anaxial (talk) 14:38, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, good to see you are putting sources in some of your edit summaries, though HuffPost looks like user generated content rather than the sort of reliable source we use here. But can I suggest you read Help:Referencing for beginners. The advantage of an inline citation is that it is much more reader friendly than expecting readers to go through the article history reading edit summaries. Thanks. Ϣere SpielChequers 09:53, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tiger

Please stop edit warring at the tiger article. Four editors have reverted you, so its pass time for you to take it to the talk page. LittleJerry (talk) 14:38, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Ilyes toon: if you do not stop edit warring with the article Tiger you are going to get reported to an administrator and get banned, you are all ready partially blocked for your behavior on another article. Catfurball (talk) 17:20, 30 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August 2024

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Least weasel. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Anaxial (talk) 17:32, 3 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. UtherSRG (talk) 13:42, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Ilyes toon's disruptive editing. Thank you. _ZZ^Z 'S 04:36, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ilyes toon. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 23:38, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Just so you're aware, this is the AGF version of this block given your previous history of edit warring and not having a ton of edits on the sock accounts locally. When you come off this block, you should behavior as appropriate and edit only from this account. Izno (talk) 23:40, 21 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]