User talk:ImiBill

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Dan Lozano.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! SarahStierch (talk) 04:15, 26 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello ImiBill! I see that you have improved your article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gigg, but you didn't resubmit it. Did you intend to? —Anne Delong (talk) 18:22, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Topblip (October 8)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Topblip.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! APerson (talk!) 13:41, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Topblip concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Topblip, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:02, 9 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:Lifevantage-logo.png

Thanks for uploading File:Lifevantage-logo.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 00:45, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Lifevantage-logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Lifevantage-logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 20:19, 16 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:LifeVantage Corporation (June 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! The submission has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.

If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

j⚛e decker ^talk 04:00, 17 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

June 2014

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. We always appreciate when users upload new images. However, it appears that one or more of the images you have recently uploaded or added to an article, specifically Draft:LifeVantage Corporation, may fail our non-free image policy. Most often, this involves editors uploading or using a copyrighted image of a living person. For other possible reasons, please read up on our Non-free image criteria. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. See WP:NFCC#9. --Stefan2 (talk) 23:08, 18 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Stop adding non-free images to Draft:LifeVantage Corporation! --Stefan2 (talk) 20:28, 20 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Topblip

Hello ImiBill. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Topblip".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Topblip}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Rankersbo (talk) 12:08, 10 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at AfC LifeVantage Corporation was accepted

LifeVantage Corporation, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

James^x12345 10:52, 11 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bilby (talk) 22:37, 12 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

ImiBill (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Bilby, allow me to explain why my user imiBill is in fact, not a sockpuppet of CastleKing1440. Note the timeline of events. My “draft” of “LifeVantage Corporation” was edited and re-submitted June 17th to AFC, and user CastleKing1440 directly posted his live version of the page on July 3rd. An impatient colleague of mine hired CastleKing1440 on Elance.com to directly post the page instead of waiting for my AFC submission to be approved. Why would I have gone through the trouble of editing and re-submitting my AFC submission if I could have directly posted it? And why would I have left my submission live in AFC if I already posted the article? I invite you to check my IP and user history against user CastleKing1440. Please reconsider and review my submission for ‘LifeVantage Corporation’. I worked very hard to create that legitimate and un-biased draft which was approved by AFC before you deleted it. All of my accounting here is true.

Accept reason:

I agree with the blocking admin's view that your explanation seems reasonable, thus I am removing your block for sockpuppetry. However, while I do not know the specifics of your situation, please make sure to read this editing policy thoroughly and respect it in order to avoid having other measures taken against you. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 16:05, 8 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have contacted Bilby and am awaiting a reply. ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 13:26, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]