User talk:Infowriter's Keyboard

This is Infowriter's Keyboard's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Professor Shonku: Characters (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Curb Safe Charmer were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Professor Shonku: Characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Professor Shonku: Characters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:23, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Infowriter's Keyboard! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:23, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Professor Shonku: Characters (August 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Liance was:

The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Professor Shonku. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Professor Shonku: Characters and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Professor Shonku: Characters, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-Liance^{talk/contribs} 03:24, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: SilverZone Foundation (August 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheBirdsShedTears was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A prime example of advertisement and self-promotion

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SilverZone Foundation and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:SilverZone Foundation, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:11, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:SilverZone Foundation

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:SilverZone Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:12, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

August 2021

Hello, I'm TheBirdsShedTears. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. TheBirdsShedTears (talk) 15:14, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Professor Shonku: Characters

Hello, Infowriter's Keyboard. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Professor Shonku: Characters, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 28 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Professor Shonku: Characters

Hello, Infowriter's Keyboard. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Professor Shonku: Characters".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:40, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

September 2022

Hello, I'm Discospinster. I noticed that you made a change to an article, BoyWithUke, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ... discospinster _talk 02:58, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks Infowriter's Keyboard (talk) 02:59, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:Your first article for guidance on what an article is supposed to contain. ... discospinster _talk 03:07, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I added citation why are you removing everything. I think you are disrespecting BoyWithUkem Infowriter's Keyboard (talk) 03:09, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The citation you provided was not reliable nor did it indicate how the subject is notable. ... discospinster _talk 03:12, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello can you please remove the redirect to Charles Yang because there is absolutely no relation between BoyWithUke and Charles Yang? Infowriter's Keyboard (talk) 03:32, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please remove the redirect Infowriter's Keyboard (talk) 03:33, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Better idea: merge all relevant content to Charles Yang, given The Philadelphia Inquirer leaked his identity. Jalen Folf (talk) 03:36, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

But this matter is all related to Boywithuke Infowriter's Keyboard (talk) 03:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know who Charles Yang is Infowriter's Keyboard (talk) 03:39, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Yang is thought to also be someone by the name of BoyWithUke so that's why it redirects. If you can show that a different BoyWithUke is a notable subject then an article could be created about him. I suggest you start working on it in the draft space, i.e. Draft:BoyWithUke. ... discospinster _talk 15:40, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Yang plays violin and has absolutely no relation with Boywithuke. Boywithuke is a Ukulele player so don't get confused. Please remove the redirect from the page. Please. Infowriter's Keyboard (talk) 18:02, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Charles Yang was born in Austin but BoyWithUke was born in Massachusetts. They might have some relation but they are not the same person. Infowriter's Keyboard (talk) 18:05, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The current draft claims the anonymous musician is "based", not "born", in Massachusetts. There's a difference. Again, if you have a source to disprove the connection claimed by The Philadelphia Inquirer, please provide it. Jalen Folf (talk) 18:14, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You see there's a misunderstanding. Philadelphia claims that they do not know if the two persons are the same. They are saying according to Wikipedia, they are the same. Infowriter's Keyboard (talk) 03:39, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of BoyWithUke (Musical Artist) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article BoyWithUke (Musical Artist) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/BoyWithUke (Musical Artist) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jalen Folf (talk) 18:22, 22 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Do not remove the article because Boywithuke is a great musician. Infowriter's Keyboard (talk) 03:36, 23 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Infowriter's Keyboard,

The outcome of this AFD deletion discussion was to let editors work on this article in Draft space. Please stop your disruptive moves to main space or you could lose your editing privileges. If someone reverts your page move or edits, it's time to stop and talk things out, not to revert the revert.

If you have questions, please bring them to the Teahouse. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:04, 29 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]