User talk:Insanity Incarnate/Archives/2008/August

Rollback

You have been granted with the rollback permission on the basis of your recent effort on dealing with vandalism. The rollback is a revert tool which can lessens the strains that normal javascripts such as twinkle put on the Wikipedia servers. You will find that you will revert faster through the rollback than through the normal reversion tools such as javascripts and the undo feature, because the rollback feature does not require fetching the data from the page history and then sending article data back to the Wikipedia server as the javascript requires, therefore you could save time especially when reverting very large articles such as the George W. Bush page. To use it, simply click the link which should look like [rollback] (which should appear unbolded if you have twinkle installed) on the lastest diff page. The rollback link will also appear on the history page beside the edit summary of the lastest edit. For more information, you may refer to this page, alternatively, you may also find this tutorial on rollback helpful.Yamamoto Ichiro 会話 02:37, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Message left on CrazyChemGuy

Please watch your reverts, you added vandalism BACK to the article and then blamed CCG on vandalizing the article. Q ^{T C} 02:03, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

How did you manage to notice that before I did...? Regardless, I disagree with the idea of just removing warnings, so I'll not remove the warning notice unless you do or say here that it is okay for me to do so. Thanks, CCG _(T-C) 02:04, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Micah Richards

Your page makes it perfectly clear that you are a complete geek. White and Nerdy would be a compliment to you!

But you decided that what I said about Micah Richard's BBC column I said it was poor and that many football fans don't like it well that's true however you somehow seemed to think it was vandalism. Like I said geek now go be a rebel and play chess. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.104.51.181 (talk) 13:02, 28 July 2008 (UTC)

Making out

Umm- I kinda wasn't awake when the vandalism of "making out" occured. Unless I did it in my sleep... 8.7.69.229 (talk) 05:20, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Someone from your IP address vandalized that page with this edit. You may have been incorrectly warned for the actions of someone else using the same internet connection as you. If this is the case, you may ignore the message that I left. — Insanity Incarnate 05:44, 23 July 2008 (UTC)

Huggle feedback

Hi there. Your huggle feedback section is now archived here. I Decided to send you this message just in case you had not seen the answers and could not find the section. If you would like to reply to this message please use my talk page as I will not be checking back here. Thanks. ·Add§hore· ^Talk/_Cont 18:41, 2 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thank you for reverting that vandal on my userpage. I'd also like to give you this:

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Thanks for your efforts to make Wikipedia better with Huggle! -- SchfiftyThree 22:23, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Regenboog Brewery article tags response

Hi, II. Pardon if this is not posted right - I'm fairly new at communicating with other editors. I'm the creator of the Regenboog Brewery article that you tagged as NPOV and Advertisement a minute after it was posted. I'm an American craft beer enthusiast and I have been making articles for notable small breweries in the US and Belgium mostly, which have all survived to date and generally not garnered much criticism. Recent changes patrollers often seem to think these articles are being created by a commerical proponenet of the brewery as an ad for some reason. I assure you I have no connection to Regenboog or any other brewery. I have attempted to write in NPOV and cite references to keep things in line. Anyhow, I would welcome any specific criticism you might have, else let's find a way to satisfy your concerns and remove the tags. Kindly note also that this article was started by translating the Dutch language Wikipedia article on the same topic. --Shorn again (talk) 04:04, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Regenboog Brewery is mostly okay, but there were a few things in the article that didn't seem to be neutral, in my opinion. It seems to have mostly positive things to say about this brewery, and these make it sound like it's written as an advertisement. There may be other opinions about it, and these should be included (well-referenced, of course!) As a general rule about neutrality on Wikipedia, if it looks like something you'd expect to find prominently displayed on the article subject's web page, it is probably too much like an advertisement, and you should tone it down to sound less complimentary of the company in question. Mostly, though, the article is fine, with only a few questionable spots. — Insanity Incarnate 04:29, 12 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for the tip on my userpage--Greenday21 (talk) 15:45, 13 August 2008 (UTC)Greenday21

RAJEEV SIGAMONEY

I moved an article you prodded, RAJEEV SIGAMONEY, to the proper title, Rajeev Sigamoney. Does that affect the prod process at all? I had sudden thoughts that I might have messed things up and wanted to ensure that I didn't. justinfr (talk) 00:00, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

It won't cause any problems. Thanks for moving it. — Insanity Incarnate 00:02, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Please learn the difference between obscenity and vandalism.

Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bingowingsyabas (talk • contribs) 02:15, 23 August 2008 (UTC)