User talk:Instalok

Welcome!

Hello, Instalok! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please leave me a {{Talkback}} message on my talk page. @ 00:12, 2 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Stop making articles without permission

Hi, there and I see you're new here so welcome! I've noticed several minutes ago that you created the Sinlaku article, although you reverted your own edit. We don't need an article for Sinlaku either. Next time, ask permission to someone like me, an admin or a responsible user for creating an article. Thanks and have a good day. Typhoon2013 (talk) 08:25, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical cyclone images and pages

Could you please stop changing images of Cyclone Kate? If there is a picture in the infobox template, then that's the best one unless the admin says so (But I am not the/an admin). Typhoon2013 (talk) 00:11, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hey, User:Typhoon2013, i can create my mine because. i'm sorry. i was a not good wikipedian, but i create my mine page like typhoon seasons. but i create this a south-west indian season.

Ok. Do you want me to help you in stuff? Because I also have my "own" typhoon seasons if you look at my user page. And that's alright. Typhoon2013 (talk) 23:59, 10 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

that was a good one User:Typhoon2013. i'm accepted. please help me to created Moderate Tropical Storm Bansi on original cyclone season, please upload this one, it's Bansi as ZDW 05 (Zone of Disturbed Weather 05), this is a file: Zone of Disturbed Weather 05 2014-01-09. oh, i forgot, please create Severe Tropical Storm Sinlaku article next week, and i changed on true pacific typhoon season, as Severe tropical storm category for Sinlaku (Queenie). 20:37, 11 January 2015 (UTC) Hey User:Typhoon2013, i'm just surprised that you create Moderate Tropical Storm Bansi in this day! i'm just create this night. i'm can upload your Picture as index.jpg ? 21:19, 11 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. But we don't need an article about Sinlaku since it was just a minor storm so I can't. No offense, but can you also please practice on your English? And also please know more about the storm categories. Thanks. Typhoon2013 (talk) 00:44, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I deleted your image about 07U because the system was not 07U...07U was southeast of Papua New Guinea, not north of New Zealand. Typhoon2013 (talk) 00:52, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(Redacted) by oversighter. Courcelles 20:42, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

2014–15 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season

If you cannot provide correct information with citations, please do not contribute to the article anymore, or you will be considered as doing vandalism. -- Meow 04:21, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

hey, you know, it that's an truly articles? it i span one years to be create Tropical Cyclone Bansi article. you never know about me. 17:23, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Sorry, Instalok. I agree with @Meow:. I want you to practice on your English more so you won't have vandalism here in Wikipedia. Also please use correct sources for an information about a storm (if I mentioned to you about that). Typhoon2013 (talk) 22:04, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The problem is that he wrote wrong information. For example Bansi has not undergone any eyewall replacement cycle, but he mentioned that many times. -- Meow 05:18, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

i'm quited now! but i just create my own. just get out of my site!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! 14:40, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

(Redacted)

01W Track map

Please. Stop making images like this since I created the real one: JTWC wp2214.gif . Someone should spot your image and delete it and it will be soon. Stop making images as well which has a bad or unsuitable license since you don't have one and it's your first time to create an image. Pleas just leave it to the experts to create images like this. Typhoon2013 (talk) 05:16, 14 January 2015 (UTC) sorry User:Typhoon2013. 14:04, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please stop. I saw your edit and reverted it in the real 2015 PTS article. With this, I will ask an admin to delete your "own created" image ASAP. Typhoon2013 (talk) 09:51, 14 January 2015 (UTC) you make many times. but i know. 17:54, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Make warnings to you? Yes. This is because you are kinda still not understanding about the policy of Wikipedia and stuff. Also if this still continues, then me or the other admin will have to decide to block you. Typhoon2013 (talk) 10:03, 14 January 2015 (UTC) i'm understanding now. 18:13, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You're understanding now? No and I can not see that from you. You are maybe lying, as well since I thought you have agreed to stop making images. Although you made another one! This is your second warning. Next time: you might be blocked! Typhoon2013 (talk) 04:46, 15 January 2015 (UTC) a Typhoon2013, please improve Typhoon Mekkhala's page because i'm created the page, for shortly knownly as Mekkhala. 16:46, 19 January 2015[reply]

Tropical Storm Pewa

As I noted when I reverted your edits yesterday, Tropical Storm Pewa did not attain typhoon -- not hurricane status, by the way -- status until entering the West Pacific, which is outside the jurisdiction of the 2013 Pacific hurricane season page. Information on that portion of the cyclone's life can be edited on the 2013 Pacific typhoon season page. TropicalAnalystwx13 (talk) 04:36, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mekkhala 2015-01-17 0332Z.jpg

There is nothing wrong, but I added something to improve it. You forgot providing the more specific link as well as the category. I hope you could add them by yourself next time. -- Meow 14:15, 17 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your userspace

Because Wikipedia's license requires attribution of previous editors, you may not copy and paste entire articles without linking the article history page and/or the revision copied from, as you did with User:Instalok/2014 Pacific typhoon season. Such pages are technically copyright violations. Also, to edit, you are expected to use proper English: this made no sense whatsoever.

Other concerns I note are that you should sign your comments with something that links to at least one of the following: this talk page, your user page, or Special:Contribs/Instalok, and your lack of edit summaries, which help others understand your intentions with edits.--Jasper Deng (talk) 20:24, 18 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The copyright issue I noted in this section is indeed important, please do address it.--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:42, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Chat?

Hi there. Do you want to chat on Facebook (if you have one) tomorrow? Just add me. You remember my name right? Typhoon2013 (talk) 10:19 ,19 January 2015 (UTC) yeah, i'm got one facebook too, but it's my second account, go and link me:https://www.facebook.com/votestralightcouncilorkinlargadas?fref=ts. and you not known just i'm changing the utc time for mekkhala? i'm link this for utc time.:http://www.typhoon2000.ph/ and for emergencies, i link this. but this is mekkhala!:http://www.ssd.noaa.gov/PS/TROP/floaters/01W/imagery/rgb-animated.gif oh hey, please place this files:Mekkhala 2015-01-19 0220Z.jpg & Mekkhala 2015-01-19 0525Z.jpg on Typhoon Mekkhala's Category, and i'm free to chat with you, Typhoon2013. 07:50, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh hey. I think you really do like tracking storms, don't you? Just keep in mind that time here in New Zealand and Philippines are different, that's why I can't go on Facebook right now since it is nearly midnight. I'll just find your name in sometime tomorrow. Thanks. Typhoon2013 (talk) 10:03, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I can’t understand this

Are you really using English in the 2014–15 South-West Indian Ocean cyclone season article? If you are, I will feel so ashamed that my English is too bad to understand. -- Meow 12:33, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yes. 20:66 PH Standard Time, 28 January 2015 (UTC)— Preceding unsigned comment added by Instalok (talk • contribs)

I will reaffirm my request that you use proper grammar, because I'm having to clean up after you, for example this. If your edits continue to be a mess to clean up after, frankly it could be construed as disruptive editing. I also do not appreciate that you never responded to this. I hope you understand.--Jasper Deng (talk) 03:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I do not appreciate being ignored; you appear to have completely ignored the importance of proper grammar in creating Cyclone Bansi. Not only that, I'm not sure Bansi is notable enough to have its own article.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:46, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just reverted another one of your edits for this reason: [1]. Sentences begin with capital letters, and the verb "started" requires a subject. If it turns out that your edits are too much work to clean up, the community may choose to block you from editing Wikipedia; please do not make me ask for that.

Most importantly, you need to communicate effectively. You never explained why you never replied to comments such as this one. Since this project is in English, you are expected to be proficient in English. Communication with other editors is extremely important, and I am worried that your failure to do so could result in a block.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:02, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

I really did not want to do this, but since you have continued to make bad edits and not respond to my concerns, I mentioned you here.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:42, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Instalok/2007 Pacific typhoon season

A tag has been placed on User:Instalok/2007 Pacific typhoon season, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copy-pasted from 2007 Pacific typhoon season. Copyrights violated.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:44, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Instalok/2010 Pacific typhoon season

A tag has been placed on User:Instalok/2010 Pacific typhoon season, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copy-pasted from 2010 Pacific typhoon season. Copyrights violated.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:44, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Instalok/2013 Pacific typhoon seson

A tag has been placed on User:Instalok/2013 Pacific typhoon seson, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copy-pasted from 2013 Pacific typhoon season. Copyrights violated.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:45, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Instalok/2015 Pacific typhoon season

A tag has been placed on User:Instalok/2015 Pacific typhoon season, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copy-pasted from 2015 Pacific typhoon season. Copyrights violated.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:45, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Instalok/2008 Pacific typhoon season

A tag has been placed on User:Instalok/2008 Pacific typhoon season, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copy-pasted from 2008 Pacific typhoon season. Copyrights violated.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Instalok/2011 Pacific typhoon season

A tag has been placed on User:Instalok/2011 Pacific typhoon season, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copy-pasted from 2011 Pacific typhoon season. Copyrights violated.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vanjagenije (talk) 15:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

copying articles

Hello Instalok,

Two things. One, you need to take the thread at WP:ANI seriously; there are legitimate concerns with your editing, and if you do not address them, you will likely be blocked from editing. Two, when you copy an article to a page in your user space to experiment with it, you need to attribute it. I see the pages above were speedy deleted; you can recreate them as long as you give attribution, similar to the way I did here. Also, you need to remove the categories, since those are only for articles in article space, as I did here. As long as you do that, there is no problem copying articles to a page in your user space. Please ask if this is not clear. And again, please listen to other editors when they have comments about your edits, or you will be blocked. --Floquenbeam (talk) 02:19, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

oh yeah, that is three time. One, you edited my edits, Two, you are deleted my page, as the recent. and Three, i'm your posting pictures of tropical cyclones. don't you know? my created as Cyclone Bansi on January 17, Cyclone Kate on 29 December, the Two Mekkhala's Pictures, and the un-category pictures. the un-category pictures are clues. --Instalok (talk) 12:40, 3 February 2015 (PST)

I'm not sure what you are trying to say, but while we do thank you for your constructive contributions, they do not excuse problematic edits such as the grammar issues you have been repeatedly introducing.--Jasper Deng (talk) 06:44, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked you as a warning that we mean business. You are still allowed to edit this page and I would like you to answer two questions. What purpose is served by copying the typhoon season articles to your user space? Do you think you would be happier editing the wiki for your native language? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 13:14, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Instalok, I hope you don't mind a few comments from an uninvolved observer here, and I don't want to offend you but I have to be honest. Your command of English is really not very good, and I, along with others, find it very hard to understand what you are saying. If you cannot speak English well enough to hold a meaningful conversation with native English speakers, then you really do not have the ability to help develop an English language encyclopedia. Have you thought about working on the Wikipedia in your own language instead? Squinge (talk) 14:17, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

so, i'm just kidding? i'am a Pilipino, and i want to join Wikipedia since Tropical Storm Podul (Tropical Depression Zoraida) active. but i'am the young forecaster that editing this fuck Wikipedia. i'am planned to not join Wikipedia anymore, beginning this month, likely on 3rd week. before it joined this, i'am too planned to making a 3 month-deal to Wikipedia. so my family continued to supporting me, while i'am in school year. --Instalok (talk) 8:03, 4 February 2015 (PST)

Wikipedia has other language editions, such as in Tagalog, and for now, I strongly suggest that you contribute to a Wikipedia where you know the language well. The problem is not your intentions, but your lack of proficiency with English, which has hindered your ability to communicate effectively on the English Wikipedia. User:RHaworth would probably appreciate it if you answered his questions (see his comment, above Squinge's comment). However it must be stressed that we cannot understand all of what you are saying because it does not make sense to us. It's for primarily this reason that you have been blocked from editing. I didn't want it to come down to that, but I just saw no other way to get you to discuss the problems I had brought up about your edits.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:57, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion

Jasper Deng, Squinge, this is while disscusion over me. and i'am planned to discussion meeting for me, and Typhoon2013, i'am sorry to edit was so bad, and copying things like the typhoon season, as it messaged me by those users recent. i'am planned, me, was a blocked, with this discussion. so i'am, planned to join again, with 27 yrs old. so the deal from Wikipedia was expired, so i'am extended an 5-month deal. by my messages says this message are don't making sense, so me are likely to sense. User:Floquenbeam|Floquenbeam

I am pleased to see that you have now done something in the Tagalog Wiki. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:52, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

G12?

Hi RHaworth, I don't really care if Instalok is blocked for a week or not - there seem to be competence problems and he doesn't seem to be replying adequately - but why are you re-deleting his sandbox version of User:Instalok/2014 Pacific typhoon season? People copy versions of articles into their user space to fiddle with them all the time, and it isn't a copyright infringement if the original source is attributed. I made such an attribution last night. I'm pretty sure you know I did this, since you've commented in the the thread I started on his talk page. -- Floquenbeam (talk) 23:29, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fiddling indeed and fiddling to the tune of 200 edits to the page you mention. Also 240 edits to User:Instalok/2013 Pacific typhoon seson with smaller numbers of edits to eight other years - see deletion log. And all to what purpose? Has he done anything to the typhoon season articles in mainspace? Has he answered my "what purpose is served" question above? — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:52, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
- @RHaworth: I guess it doesn't matter that you haven't answered my question, since from context I gather the answer is: "It isn't actually G12, I'm just saying that because it's on a pull-down menu and I don't feel like typing 'user is goofing around' by hand". As long as you know it isn't actually G12, and you're not doing this to other people, I guess I'll move on. (I would ask why you moved this to Instalok's talk page, but you'd probably answer that with three questions too, and then I'd be down 6 to 2.) --Floquenbeam (talk) 17:27, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

don't fight, as while blocked, the categories on SSHWS much unofficial due to 2006,07,08,09 and 10. my categories on 2011,12,13,14 and 2015-present are corrected using NOAA, and the SSHWS on 2013,14 and 2015-present are corrected too using Typhoon2013 scales. 8:25, 4 February 2015 (PST)
- Your "corrected" categories were wrong for the most part. For example, Typhoon Rammasun was Category 4, not 5. Furthermore Typhoon2013's scale is not the SSHWS and has no official status. If you feel like you have valid corrections to add to articles, you should work with other editors like Typhoon2013 to insert the corrections into the articles in question. Your userspace is not for storing your preferred revisions of those articles, per WP:FAKEARTICLE.--Jasper Deng (talk) 15:17, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  - Both JMA and JTWC are different, for example, The scale of Severe Tropical Storm Fengshen, as Typhoon2013 was classified an typhoon. but, the JMA peaked as 10-minute sustained winds, and the JTWC (or Saffir-Simpson hurricane wind scale) are classified Fengshen as Tropical Storm, but NOAA was on JMA's partner, or part of the scale. 6:53, 5 February 2015 (PST)
    - The SSHWS cannot be applied to 10-minute winds, as you surely know, so you cannot apply it to the JMA's readings. JTWC and NOAA's data on 1-minute winds are the same set of data files, so they will never disagree on SSHWS categorization. The term "tropical storm" on one scale is not necessarily equivalent to "tropical storm" on another, so it is not a matter of "right" or "wrong" categories.--Jasper Deng (talk) 22:59, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
      - So the NOAA was part of JTWC's Scale? 7:04,5 February 2015 (PST)
        I don't understand what you're asking; JTWC and NOAA use the same wind data, to which SSHWS can be applied. In any case, there was no reason to create those pages (@Typhoon2013: this applies to you too) because of WP:FAKEARTICLE. When your edits to a page are disputed, you shouldn't copy the article solely for keeping a version that conforms to how you want it, unless you intend to merge your version into the original article at a later point.--Jasper Deng (talk) 01:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
    - I said so the NOAA was part of JTWC's scale?, so, i can explain. so the scales of Typhoon2013 was in fake. 6:50, 5 February 2015 (PST)

Second Discussion and interaction with Typhoon2013

So, Jasper Deng, Floquenbeam was right. don't block because every user copying those seasons, like @Typhoon2013:. if anyone guess were me was blocked, likely to extended an 4 week or every week, so this is the interactions with me and without Floquenbeam's interaction messages. talk Instalok for more details 10:22, 7 February 2015 (PST)

That wasn't the reason you were blocked. You were blocked because it had become clear that you were ignoring my concerns and in general, not communicating effectively.--Jasper Deng (talk) 08:06, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No. i'm not sure, but i'cant. please, blocked for sure, so happiness were been result. so the result, on next couple of days, or 10 february, don't stop blocking me. so the result, i'm happy now. but sometimes, join to Wikipedia were be plan. 6:01, 7 February 2015 (PST)

@Jasper Deng: In the next topic. You need to see this immediately. Typhoon2013 (talk) 03:15, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Probably your last warning

I have once again properly attributed User:Instalok/2014 Pacific typhoon season for you. This is exactly the same problem I explained above. This is the last time I will do this for you. The next time, I will assume you do not understand enough about how this site works to edit here, and I will block you indefinitely.

Keep in mind that a similar warning applies to all the other information people have been trying to tell you in the last few weeks. If you continue to ignore this feedback, the only real solution is to block you from editing, in order to save the time of other editors constantly reviewing and fixing your errors. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:46, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

so i can fix it the errors. @RHworth: deleted this page, so the categories of SSHWS were no problems, and Fung-wong, I said on it's Storm List, that it's upgraded into severe tropical storm. as it true annual season, was it downgraded into tropical storm. and it did Sinlaku became severe tropical storm and downgrades into tropical storm. so this time, i'am confident, so i read the Wikipedia. 7:57, 12 February 2015 (PST)

This doesn't make any sense; I think the communication problem is probably too strong. Do you understand any of what I am saying? --Floquenbeam (talk) 00:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

yeah, @Floquenbeam:. communication was part of my school exercise don't you know? so it explained that communication was part of my school, but i think you deleted again my season page. 8:10, 12 February 2015 (PST)

This ignores everything I said to you before about grammar. @Floquenbeam: I really hope Instalok understands this because the block has done nothing to change his behavior.--Jasper Deng (talk) 04:43, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Re:First Warning On Your first scale

I assume that you have seen my user articles. For Wikipedia, this is not a warning. The other users you have mentioned actually said that it was kind of interesting. Please do not believe on my user articles and I am sorry if you didn't know about it. That means I don't have warning, it was a mistake. Typhoon2013 (talk) 03:05, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

don't said that, my message for you was true. see the 3 messsages on top; you can respectful for those 3 users. 11:09, 12 February 2015 (PST)

I've seen the topic and I get what you mean. But please next time, don't use one of my user articles for a source as well. Typhoon2013 (talk) 03:14, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Also yes. I have to warn people as well to not use some of my user articles. Some of them are real and some are fake. That's why I left a message in my user page. Typhoon2013 (talk) 03:17, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I got too many replies here in a row. But as @Jasper Deng: says, this not the cause that you were blocked (even though I didn't know that you were blocked). You were blocked because of a little bit of false info at first and bad grammar. Typhoon2013 (talk) 03:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Instalok/2015 Pacific typhoon season

A tag has been placed on User:Instalok/2015 Pacific typhoon season, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Copied from 2015 Pacific typhoon season without attribution.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:00, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

you again, Vanjagenije? why? the problem was both you are deleted my 2015 season? whatever that i copying the season, the important was create my season. The Longer that it lived here, the longer that no can deleted my season page. so that was my reason. 6:47 PM, 12 February 2015 (PST)

I haven't checked that page, but by that deletion criterion, you may as well delete who-knows how many sandboxes and subpages of WPTC editors. Dustin (talk) 02:34, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

I'm sorry, it is clear you are unable to contribute here without constantly making significant work for other people. I understand this may be partially due to a language issue, but it is also true you are refusing to try to understand what people are telling you, or to change your behavior. I have blocked this account indefinitely. --Floquenbeam (talk) 11:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2015

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Floquenbeam (talk) 11:12, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Bye

thanks for your help, for improved my school records. i think i not became behave now, so my message is, bye for your page. thank you for your help, but i'm happy to help, edit or added a new. so Bye. 7:21 PM, 12 February 2015 (PST)

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Fairyspit (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mike V • Talk 01:54, 15 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

While CheckUser normally doesn't lie, I don't think the behaviors are at all similar. However this user is himself socking, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Instalok.--Jasper Deng (talk) 00:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Instalok, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jasper Deng (talk) 00:52, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Instalok, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jasper Deng (talk) 05:33, 26 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation

Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Instalok, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.

Jasper Deng (talk) 05:42, 13 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]