User talk:InvestigateUdom

Welcome!

Hello, InvestigateUdom, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! The Rambling Man (talk) 12:27, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Edits to One-Two-GO

If information is "easily available to the public", then it should be easy for you to provide references backing up all your changes, no? Jpatokal (talk) 04:39, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your Edits to Orient Thai Airlines and One- Two- Go Airlines

Your edits appear to be vandalism. Can you please refrain from doing this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Udom N. Tantiprasongchai (talk • contribs) 08:38, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

I can see you like to terrorise people. Stop now or you will be blocked. I am referring you to the admin to block you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.106.17.105 (talk) 06:15, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability

I will let you in one something. The criterion for inclusion is verifiability, not truth. If the newspapers and aviation safety journals do not say anything about corruption in the One Two Go case, then Wikipedia says nothing. WhisperToMe (talk) 23:46, 27 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Verifiability Response

Excuse me, I don't know if my page is the correct place to reply to the concerns about verifiability, but here is my reply: The material commonly known and referenced earlier on this page, has now been published in numerous formats including the NTSB report, the Thai version of the Crash Report, the British Coroner's report and several news articles. Therefore I will update the information in the article and remove the dispute tag.InvestigateUdom (talk) 14 July 2011 (UTC)

The NTSB report, Thai final report, and Coroner report (AFAIK) are all okay. As long as those are specifically cited and as long as "synthesis" (see WP:OR and see the synthesis section) is not used, then it should be okay.

If you have more questions, please let me know

WhisperToMe (talk) 20:13, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

One-Two-GO Airlines Flight 269

Hi. I have reverted lots of your edits to One-Two-GO Airlines Flight 269. The airline was bought by Orient Thai Airlines and finally in July 2010, One-Two-Go was integrated into Orient Thai Airlines. The airline was nothing to do with One-Two-GO Airlines at the time of the crash. So we dont want to give the reader the impression that at the time of the crash it was apart of Orient Thai Airlines. --JetBlast (talk) 14:39, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Jet Blast -- You are incorrect. One-Two-Go and Orient Thai were always owned and managed by the same corporation with exactly the same management team. The only difference between the companies was paint on the aircraft and pilots. I will find references to this fact in press and legal files, if you feel the need for so basic an element to be sited. Thank you for your interest in this material. I am interested in stating only facts.

Even if this is the case (not sure i got my info from Orient Thai Airlines page) they still operated under different IATA, ICAO & Callsigns so should not be counted as one airline in the article. Even if they are owned by the same group--JetBlast (talk) 14:54, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

JetBlast -- Why is obfuscation helpful to an encyclopedia? I'm not trying to push a fact Orient Thai tried to hide until after the corruption was made public. They promoted themselves as One-Two-Go by Orient Thai, then as Orient Thai's One-Two-Go and now as Orient Thai. InvestigateUdom (talk) 15:00, 15 July 2011 (UTC)InvestigateUdom[reply]

I am not, but that’s the way it is on here. For example look at this SilkAir Flight 185 the airline SilkAir is owned by Singapore Airlines. It doesn't go Singapore Airlines SilkAir like you put Orient Thai One-Two-GO Airlines. One-Two-GO Airlines and Orient Thai Airlines should not be counted as one airline all the way though the article as they operated under different IATA, ICAO & Callsigns. If you can find a good source to support the fact they where owned by the same group at the time include this in an appropriate place once. You dont need to repeat it hundreds of times. --JetBlast (talk) 15:07, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Have put in a compromise, noting that Udom is the CEO of both airlines and that the merge is a branding fact. Removed other references. Agree that constant reference is over the top. Disagree that the fact should be so far down in the article. InvestigateUdom (talk) 15:14, 15 July 2011 (UTC)InvestigateUdom[reply]

Ok at the moment it seems ok to me. By the way we post on your talk page not mine. Thanks for the input to the article. :-) --JetBlast (talk) 15:17, 15 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Made significant update to OG 269 material. Let me know if you have any concerns. InvestigateUdom (talk) 13:18, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing Wikipedia because your username, InvestigateUdom, editing on behalf of an organisation known as http://www.investigateudom.com/.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "E-mail this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you feel that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Runway 27.pdf

A tag has been placed on File:Runway 27.pdf requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F10 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a file that is not an image, sound file or video clip (e.g. a Word document or PDF file) that has no encyclopedic use.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pkbwcgs (talk) 13:01, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:OG 269 crashed.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:OG 269 crashed.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. 廣九直通車 (talk) 05:10, 23 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]