Jump to content

User talk:Isla an cù

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Isla an cù, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Isla an cù! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Welcome!

[edit]
Hello, Isla an cù! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! Devokewater (talk) 12:04, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Infoboxes

[edit]

Please do not add infoboxes to existing articles unless you first discuss it on the article's Talk page and raise a WP:CONSENSUS to do so. -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The Manual of Style says: "Whether to include an infobox ... is determined through discussion and consensus among the editors at each individual article." While sports and politician bios can benefit from infoboxes, most articles in liberal arts fields, as here, do not. See arbitration report: "Infoboxes may be particularly unsuited to liberal arts fields when they repeat information already available in the lead section of the article, are misleading or oversimplify the topic for the reader". Here are some disadvantages to infoboxes: (1) The boxes often emphasize unimportant factoids stripped of context and lacking nuance, in competition with the WP:LEAD section, which emphasizes and contextualizes the most important facts. (2) Since the most important points in the article are already discussed in the Lead, or adequately discussed in the body of the article, the box would be redundant. (3) It would take up valuable space at the top of the article and hamper the layout and impact of the Lead. (4) Frequent errors creep into infoboxes, as updates are made to the articles but not reflected in the redundant info in the box, and they tend to draw vandalism, fancruft and repeated arguments among editors about what to include. (5) The boilerplate infobox templates create a block of code at the top of the edit screen that discourages new editors from editing the article. (6) It would discourage readers from reading the text of the article. (7) IBs distract editors from focusing on the content of the article. Instead of improving the article, they spend time working on this repetitive feature and its coding and formatting. See also WP:DISINFOBOX. -- Ssilvers (talk) 03:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

James Wordie
added a link pointing to FRS
John Graham Kerr
added a link pointing to Royston

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 7 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that you recently added links to disambiguation pages.

James Wordie
added a link pointing to FRS
John Abercrombie (physician)
added a link pointing to Adam Hunter
John Bruce (minister)
added a link pointing to Free Church of Scotland

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Günther Lütjens, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Company officer.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:03, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Joseph Dalton Hooker, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page MD.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 27 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Darcey Bussell, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Borne.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A cup of coffee for you!

[edit]
Isla an cù, I see you removed the names of Darcey Bussell 's daughters from the article, and I will presume you have a good reason to, and although puzzled, will not question you on why. James Kevin McMahon (talk) 02:53, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]