User talk:JRtheDude

Welcome!

Hello, JRtheDude, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! —C.Fred (talk) 00:39, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Creator deity appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:39, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Observable science

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Observable science, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Observable science. JohnCD (talk) 21:31, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You will find the reasons for my proposed deletion in the guidelines on Verifiability, No Original Research and Neologisms. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 21:35, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Origin Science has been proposed for deletion under the same reasoning. —C.Fred (talk) 22:18, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not sign articles in the text

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been adding your signature to some of your article contributions, such as the edit you made to Origin Science. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thanks for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 02:15, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please consider taking the AGF Challenge

I would like to invite you to consider taking part in the AGF Challenge which has been proposed for use in the RfA process [1] by User: Kim Bruning. You can answer in multiple choice format, or using essay answers, or anonymously. You can of course skip any parts of the Challenge you find objectionable or inadvisable.--Filll (talk) 03:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evolution as fact and theory

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Evolution as fact and theory, you will be blocked from editing. WLU (talk) 15:50, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Evolution

You seem to be interested in evolution, particularly from the perspective that it is false and creationism is a valid, competing theory. Please review the archives of various pages before posting more comments - as is they will not result in any change to the mainpage, and if conintued may possibly result in blocks for disruptive editing. Please review Talk:Evolution/FAQ; if after that review you still feel you have verifiable information that comes from reliable sources (note that the best sources are mainstream scientific journals and books published by reputed press - creationist journals that do not pass peer review by mainstream biologists, and publishing houses that publish religious topics only are not considered of sufficient weight to source any statements beyond the beliefs of creationists, and can not be used in articles addressing evolution. Only creationism and the cultural controversy) the please present the sources for review. Note that wikipedia is not a soapbox and can not be used to advocate a specific point of view. WLU (talk) 15:56, 19 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OR

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Evolution as theory and fact, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please verify your additions with reliable sources, coming form mainstream and not fringe publications. Please review the neutral point of view FAQ and evolution FAQ. Claims about 'information' in mutations are not mainstream, and there's no such thing as 'real' evolution versus 'fake' evolution. If you are speaking of speciation, there is no distinction between evolution at an individual level and evolution at a species level as far as the mechanism. WLU (talk) 01:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "One Wiki to Rule Them All"

A page you created, One Wiki to Rule Them All, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a website, but it does not indicate how it is important or significant, and thus why it should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for websites in particular.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 19:27, 21 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]