User talk:Jackpanther1

Jackpanther1 (talk) 22:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC)Welcome![reply]

Hello, Jackpanther1, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 20:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 08:40, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Jackpanther1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #23946 was submitted on Feb 14, 2019 08:45:55. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 08:45, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackpanther1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have not created any duplicate accounts nor posted any article. The admin seems have misunderstanding. I request to review the block. Jackpanther1 (talk) 10:23, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

You have admitted to violating WP:SOCK here: [1] Yamla (talk) 11:38, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackpanther1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I read WP:SOCK but i have not created any other accounts. I have asked friend of mine to fix article for me but he fixed and submitted request from his account. So i believe i have not created multiple accounts. I request you to unblock me i will try to write article myself. Also please suggest what steps should be done so we can assure you about this. If you see my account log i have performed certain draft edits of my article and later it was submitted by my friend. I am not lying as you can see all logs. Its my humble request for you to look into this and provide a unblock as i am new user to Wikipedia i have no much experience that is why i asked him to help. I agree that it is my mistake. Also i told other admin truth that i asked friend. Its a mistake done by me, i request for unblock for my account Jackpanther1. Jackpanther1 (talk) 16:21, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

What you describe is meatpuppetry, which is treated no differently than sock puppetry, as we have no way of knowing who is sitting at the computer using a particular account or accounts. In looking at your draft, it seems that you just want to tell the world about your application. I'm not convinced that you understand the Wikipedia policies involved here, including WP:COI. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 16:52, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You cannot remove declined unblock requests while you are blocked. I have restored them. 331dot (talk) 17:38, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are providing the biased reasons i wanted some other admin to view the block i told you before i asked friend to fix issues Jackpanther1 (talk) 17:42, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You are free to make another unblock request, which will be reviewed by another administrator. As I indicated, the prior declined requests must remain until the block is removed. 331dot (talk) 17:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I request you to guide me what should i do? as i mentioned i am not lying and its not my fault. Jackpanther1 (talk) 17:47, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored the block notice with the unblock request template; simply use that to make another request. You will need to explain that you understand the situation and how your behavior will be different in the future. As I stated, someone else will review it. 331dot (talk) 18:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for guiding i posted again the request i hope the admins will see the entire request.

review

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jackpanther1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have read WP:SOCK and WP:MEAT. I mentioned above that i am new user here. I only asked friend to help in grammer i wanted to contribute. When i started article draft it says that before publish if you are in doubt ask for help as i did asked helped from friend. I am not writing any thing for me or for my own thing. I request you to give me last chance. Most of the people here don't listen to and decline requests without reading whole thing. I therefore request you to guide and help. If you can not help it make no sense to stay here , if so delete my account and my stuff. I want a last chance to prove myself. I there for request you for help. Now please tell how to proceed in correct way?

More over i wanted to add that i will be very very careful in the future and will seek guidelines from wikipedia editors before doing anything. I hope you will grant me unblock. I assure that that in future i will be very careful. I understand the situation as i read the topics mentioned by admins, i hope to get a guideline and help and request for unblock.

Jackpanther1 (talk) 18:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Per below. Huon (talk) 02:01, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, setting aside my concerns about WP:UPEand WP:AGFing on the "friend", I would require a WP:TBAN on Open Source Social Network. You should read and heed WP:COI and WP:PAID. Please, what constructive edits would you make? How will you help to improve Wikipedia, the world's larges free-content encyclopedia? All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking. Dlohcierekim (talk)

Thank you for taking time to reading entire messages above below are my answers

WP:COI AND WP:PAID, I have read conflict of interest and i am not being paid or directly or indirectly assosiated with any of my topic. I would like to contribute to more technology topics and wanted to add more topics about technologies. And about Paid-contribution disclosure i am not being paid or to pay some one to help article.

Wikipedia:Reliable sources , I have read it and i will assure you to take care of this in futrue and will be very very careful. If you see my draft most of topic resources are from source website i have done this because i have seen other topics like Joomla Wordpress Boonex Dolphin the editors cited from the source website. I will now be careful about this since mentioned. I will look for the independent source that are not linked with the topic website and will continue to improve in my draft and ask for advice from editors to review the topic before i actually submit for publish.

I would like to have a last chanace and for contribute to wikipedia from reaiable and would like to ask editors reviews before i submit any of topics further I would like to make contribnutions regarding to topics like TCP/IP, OSI, Embeeded System, Software Web Server.

I request a last chance and request unblock and i assure you that the violation wont happen again. Looking forward for your reply and request you to ask me any question if above didn't make any sense before declining my request. Jackpanther1 (talk) 06:54, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have any chance to view the account please ? Jackpanther1 (talk) 22:47, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Dlohcierekim and Yunshui. Personally I'm rather skeptical but would be willing to give a second chance, with the understanding that Jackpanther1 will agree to a topic ban regarding Open Source Social Network (which doesn't appear to be a notable subject anyway). Huon (talk) 22:09, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I am deeply skeptical about the denial of undisclosed paid editing; the timing of this account's edits and the acceptance of an Upwork advert requesting a Wikipedia page on OSSN are too precise to be a plausible coincidence. Whilst I won't wheel war over it if my colleagues disagree, I am opposed to an unblock. Yunshui ^雲 _水 22:28, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't aware of the Upwork angle when I wrote the above; that will need explaining. "Your friend" is someone you hired on Upwork? Yeah, no, sorry. Huon (talk) 22:35, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disinclined to unblock. The UPE issue continues to cast a ghastly pall. Even w/o that, the WP:TBAN on OSSN is de rigueur & sine qua non to any thought of unblocking. Yet, even with a new subject, we'd never feel sure. DlohCier ekim 22:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Which upwork? Yunshui be clear which upwork ? Jackpanther1 (talk) 11:59, 3 March 2019 (UTC) I am not being paid or paid anyone, who telling you i am being paid? Provide some evidence don't blame Jackpanther1 (talk)[reply]

Further forget about these pages. I don't want to break any of the terms of wikipedia. That is why i am asking for unblock. I can create different account with different name and add different topics you won't even find out but this is not ethical and now allowed by wikipedia. This Yunshui is just doing discrimination. I request you to unblock , you may block me from creating topics. Jackpanther1 (talk) 12:21, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Also do you think instead of wasting time in this non-sense talk , i can create new account, different name, location and start editing the different stuff but this is not allowed by wikipedia and i am here for requesting unblock and explaining the situation. You know every thing is possible, but i am bound to the terms. Jackpanther1 (talk) 13:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Review existing unblock request

Can you please review my unblock request to Dlohcierekim above. I am unable to ask Dlohcierekim on his talk. I request you to read above all replies and help for unblock— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jackpanther1 (talk • contribs)

Only one open request is needed, it will be reviewed in due course, please be patient. 331dot (talk) 23:08, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Looks like most of the editors are just sitting here like thinking they are God specially the Yunshui. However i appreciated your help through out the process. I wanted to add that if i am fake , i can create new account with different address, name, location, computer and start editing the stuff you know no one will find out and start editing other stuff, but this is against the terms. Do the above editors thinks i am arrogant? for creating requests and explaining the situation? Jackpanther1 (talk) 13:18, 3 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]