User talk:JamieBrown2011

This is JamieBrown2011's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2: 31 days

Welcome!

August 2024

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote. While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. Raladic (talk) 18:11, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Noted. It is one editor, not a plurality, and If you read the discussion you will notice the the editor is neither biased or partisan to this topic User talk:WhatamIdoing#A voice of reason JamieBrown2011 (talk) 07:24, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The message you left for them certainly wasn't neutral though. Cordless Larry (talk) 08:42, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello JamieBrown2011! Your additions to Sinner's prayer have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, it's important to understand and adhere to guidelines about using information from sources to prevent copyright and plagiarism issues. Here are the key points:

Limited quotation: You may only copy or translate a small portion of a source. Any direct quotations must be enclosed in double quotation marks (") and properly cited using an inline citation. More information is available on the non-free content page. To learn how to cite a source, see Help:Referencing for beginners.
Paraphrasing: Beyond limited quotations, you are required to put all information in your own words. Following the source's wording too closely can lead to copyright issues and is not permitted; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when paraphrasing, you must still cite your sources as appropriate.
Image use guidelines: In most scenarios, only freely licensed or public domain images may be used and these should be uploaded to our sister project, Wikimedia Commons. In some scenarios, non-freely copyrighted content can be used if they meet all ten of our non-free content criteria; Wikipedia:Plain and simple non-free content guide may help with determining a file's eligibility.
Copyrighted material donation: If you hold the copyright to the content you want to copy, or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license the text for publication here. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Copying and translation within Wikipedia: Wikipedia articles can be copied or translated, however they must have proper attribution in accordance with Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. For translation, see Help:Translation § License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices. Persistent failure to comply may result in being blocked from editing. If you have any questions or need further clarification, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Compassionate727 ^(T·C) 14:11, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for highlighting this. I will take a closer look at my edit, but I believe I did put the two sentences in double quotation marks here. This is also a tiny portion of the source. Am I missing something?</nowiki>JamieBrown2011 (talk) 08:33, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

It appears that you have been canvassing—leaving messages on a biased choice of users' talk pages to notify them of an ongoing community decision, debate, or vote—in order to influence Talk:International Churches of Christ . While friendly notices are allowed, they should be limited and nonpartisan in distribution and should reflect a neutral point of view. Please do not post notices which are indiscriminately cross-posted, which espouse a certain point of view or side of a debate, or which are selectively sent only to those who are believed to hold the same opinion as you. Remember to respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building by allowing decisions to reflect the prevailing opinion among the community at large. Thank you. You inappropriately canvassed WhatamIdoing to Talk:International Churches of Christ#NPOV in your edit at Special:Diff/1246354903. Please do not continue to engage in this behaviour. TarnishedPath^talk 03:30, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So firstly you should read your policies Wikipedia:APPNOTE before making this kind of silly and childish post. The editor has previous involvement and the language was neutral. Also, this is the second time I am requesting you to stop following me around Wikipedia Wikipedia:HOUNDING . JamieBrown2011 (talk) 13:44, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Per WP:INAPPNOTE, your canvassing was inappropriate as it was selective. If your canvassing was to be appropriate you ought to have notified ALL prevoiusly involved editors, which you clearly did not. As per your accuation that I am following your arround, it is clearly apparent that I was already involved in the section where you inappropriately canvassed the editor. In fact I was notified by your comment because I am subscribbed to that thread and have been since I first commented on it. This is the third time now that I've commented on your inappropriate canvassing. I suggest you cease inappropriately canvassing editors. TarnishedPath^talk 23:19, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Do you even read these policies? It is acceptable if it is “limited and neutral”. Which is why your previous accusations failed as much as this one has. You are barking up the wrong tree mate. JamieBrown2011 (talk) 01:37, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes I did read it. You need to dial back your incivil behaviour. You have clearly notified one editor and one editor alone from a discussion elsewhere. Given you have written that the editor is "a much needed voice of reason" in that same discussion it is clear that this is WP:VOTESTACKING. I'm advising you that it's inappropriate and requesting that you discontinue the behaviour. If you want to engage in WP:IDHT that's on you. TarnishedPath^talk 03:02, 20 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of neutral point of view noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is International Churches of Christ. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 18:47, 9 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]