User talk:JamieLourenco

Gender symbol

Since the rise of dynamically-loaded browser fonts, recently-added Unicode characters are more likely to display, but it's definitely not 100%, so your edit had value. I would not have had the patience to track down all the different image files in that context, and your edit was the first unequivocally positive edit to that article in some time, therefore the thanking... AnonMoos (talk) 12:45, 15 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Hello, I'm McGeddon. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Ozymandias, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. McGeddon (talk) 10:19, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You need a secondary source - a newspaper or magazine that has written about the poem's appearance in the advert. The advert itself is a WP:PRIMARY source and isn'tenough. For similar situations in shows like Breaking Bad, the article draws on press coverage which discussed the show's use of the poem in some detail. It's a useful rule of thumb to ensure that Wikipedia only lists the most significant aspects of a work's pop culture appearances. --McGeddon (talk) 10:36, 16 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, it's relatively new, so I guess I'll have to wait a few days for something like that, thanks for the help.