User talk:Jammu58

Welcome!

Hi Jammu58! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Zefr (talk) 15:42, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is Jammu58's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Essence of Baha'i Faith (August 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Essence of Baha'i Faith and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Essence of Baha'i Faith, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 12:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jammu58! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 12:43, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Natural product editing

Hello. I would suggest you reconsider editing topics for which you may not be qualified, WP:CIR. Your edits on the Natural product article include misspelling, are incorrect, and are not supported by high-quality sources. Biosynthesis and anti-disease claims require reputable sources, as explained in WP:MEDRS. If English is difficult for you to write or understand, and you do not comprehend MEDRS, then please don't edit. You can respond here, if you wish. Zefr (talk) 15:47, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome, but be careful

Welcome to Wikipedia. Here are suggested readings: WP:SECONDARY and WP:COI. The gist of these guidelines are:

Wikipedia prefers citations to reviews and books, not primary journal references (tens of thousands appear annually). Citing secondary sources is the encyclopedic style.
Do not cite yourself or your colleagues. It's called conflict of interest. Many new editors cite themselves mainly. That behavior is unacceptable.

If you have questions, many editors can offer advice. Happy editing.--Smokefoot (talk) 13:57, 29 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited B. S. Chandrasekhar, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Prasanna. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:24, 1 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing.

HelloHistoryofiran. Greetings: I have not reverted any of your edits on this page. I have just gone to scholars name and gave internal link of Wikipidea pages or external link of wikishia pages available on net. You have undo three different links of three different scholars not the same scholar, which was linked to wikishia pages. I would like to know can we not give wikishia links? You have also said “read my previous summary” I coudnt find it. I think there is some misunderstanding which made you sent Edit warring.Have a nice time.Jammu58 (talk) 08:41, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Jammu58: Warning You will be blocked if you repeat edits without first gaining consensus on the article talk page. If you are trying to add a reference to verify a statement in the article, you need to get help on how to do that (try WP:Teahouse). You must explain at Talk:Ibn Babawayh why you believe your edit should be retained. After that, you must wait until other editors agree before trying to repeat your edit. Johnuniq (talk) 09:25, 3 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Essence of Baha'i Faith

Hello, Jammu58. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Essence of Baha'i Faith, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. Bot0612 (talk) 22:13, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Essence of Baha'i Faith

Hello, Jammu58. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Essence of Baha'i Faith".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:57, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]