User talk:JasonLWriter

April 2018

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Draft:Judge Graham. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi James, can you please tell me which sections are considered promotional? Thanks! JasonLWriter (talk) 15:15, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do you work in marketing or PR? Very often people who work in those fields get so used to seeing marketing-speak all day long that they get desensitised to it, and can't see it when it is right in front of them, and that is the only possible explanation I can think of for your asking that question. It's not a question of "sections" which are promotional: it's the whole tone of the page, from start to finish. I can't imagine anyone reading it and not getting the impression that it is written with the intention of impressing us with what a great job Graham has been doing. Are you writing on his behalf, as a client of yours? The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:51, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judge Graham (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vexations was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

"one of the foremost innovators" is not WP:NPOV

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Judge Graham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Judge Graham, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vexations (talk) 15:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JasonLWriter! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vexations (talk) 15:49, 19 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Judge Graham (May 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

adv,bio

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Judge Graham and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Judge Graham, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 07:53, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Judge Graham

Hello, JasonLWriter. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Judge Graham".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:52, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]