User talk:Jay42

Thanks a lot, Jay.

Dancanm 12:24, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

why speedy delete?

Please help me understand why you put the article on National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health up for speedy deletion. Your note there, which I have removed, claims that it is a duplicate of an article titled NIOSH which is "more complete." But I see that NIOSH contains NO text and redirects to National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. So, what's going on? Pzavon 02:10, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible that I misunderstood. Are the acronyms different? I did a quick run through and they looked to be the same organization.

If they're not... wow. I'm really sorry about that >_>. Jay42 21:07, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure I understand your comment. NIOSH is indeed the acronym for "National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health" but there is only one article, titled National Institute of Occupational Safety and Health. If you try to go to an article titled NIOSH you get redirected to the article titled "National Institute ..." So if you speedy delete that article, you remove the only article on the subject. Pzavon 04:56, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I'm trying to figure out exactly what I did as well. From what I can tell, a redirect was set up between the time I set up that template and the time it was checked? That's all I can think of... I'll be more careful with my templates in the future.Jay42 05:15, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Check out this article

I just found it: Never Gonna Give You Up

...Right. Always good to see fellow LUEser Wikipedians. Crystallina 00:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Hindu article

Thank you for not getting into a revert war. I think I should say sorry for perhaps not explaining clearly why I removed the post initially. Anyway, the anon posted a message about the burning of churches and did not explain its connection with Hindu. Even if the anon provided reliable sources and presented his/her information in an WP:NPOV manner, it hardly seemed relevant to Hindu and would thus fail WP:UNDUE. Maybe I should have assumed good faith but my initial reaction was that it was spam. Gizza^Discuss ^© 11:52, 10 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]