User talk:JazzlineB

RE:User:xx rejrets xx

The activity on their account does strongly suggest a vandalism only/networking account. It seems they have stopped vandalising; if they continue to vandalise, then they will be blocked. Keep an eye on them :)

Seraphim ^Whipp 01:39, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thy Serpent

Hey, no problem. No I've never even heard of them before. I was just thinking I hadn't seen much of you recently, so figured I'd see what you had been editing, and came across that page that I thought I may as well move! Hope all is well...Nouse4aname (talk) 09:53, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cool. Its good to broaden your horizons!! Nouse4aname (talk) 15:15, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note

previous discussion]. The original shred metal page was discussed and it was decided to re-direct the page to the Neo-classical metal page. I don't see where you recent page moves have had any discussion or consensus among other editors. Anger22 (Talk 2 22) 20:36, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Twilight Guardians

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Twilight Guardians, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? tomasz. 17:19, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

well, they likely aren't, if that's the case. Maybe if the article had made any attempt to show that, it wouldn't have looked like it failed WP:MUSIC. tomasz. 17:51, 21 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Please do not vandalize pages like you did with this edit. Gorgoroth is in no way, shape, or form christian rock. Undeath (talk) 01:54, 4 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Sami Tenetz

A tag has been placed on Sami Tenetz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Leonard^(Bloom) 03:14, 14 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Could you provide some references or claims of notability? If it stays the way it is, I'll probably prod it. Leonard^(Bloom) 04:30, 15 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding edits made during December 5 2008

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - auburnpilot talk 19:40, 5 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sami Tenetz

The article Sami Tenetz has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I cannot find any significant coverage in reliable source to show notability for this unreferenced biography of a living person.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chzz ► 15:36, 4 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:39, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Soulgrind

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Soulgrind requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Skeletor3000 (talk) 02:17, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Soulgrind

The article Soulgrind has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Tagged for notability since 2008. All I can find is lyrics sites and no RS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Mccapra (talk) 05:31, 25 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]