User talk:Jeffreyweisman

December 2013

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeffreyweisman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Jeffreyweisman (talk) 12:52, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:37, 8 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Wikipedia Editor: please explain what blocking is and why I have been blocked. You seem to have me mixed up with a mischief-maker but I am not he. Sincerely Jeffrey R. Weisman. P.S. to whom should I email?

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeffreyweisman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Insert your reason to be unblocked here

Decline reason:

You were blocked because someone with access to the checkuser tool believes that your account was created to be used with others to violate policy. And this is based on more than just the IP address (I cannot say more). Good day, sir! — Daniel Case (talk) 04:20, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Dear Wikipedia Editor: I have not made any edits. I have done no mischief. Please clarify. Sincerely, Jeffrey R. Weisman. PS -- to whom should I email? I read the guidelines and do not understand.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jeffreyweisman (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Your reason here Jeffreyweisman (talk) 12:11, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Aah, if only you realised how easily you give yourself away! Even without the checkuser evidence it is so obvious that you are the same person as Critic11. The more you try to get out of your block by using sockpuppets and pretending to be someone else, the less likely it will be that your original account will ever be unblocked, because the more it will look as though you can't be trusted. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:10, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please unblock! Jeffrey R. Weisman.

You should stick with your main account (User:Critic11) rather than post unblock requests there and here that are virtually identical in style.--Bbb23 (talk) 00:02, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

???? Please tell me what this is about? Who is Critic11? What did I do? I think you are mistaking me with someone else. JRW. Please unblock this account!

Note to reviewing admin: this is as unambiguous a checkuser finding as I've ever seen. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 18:52, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What is unambiguous? What do you know that I do not know? Truly, I am mystified by this. What is going on? Would someone please explain? Do you ever make mistakes? I think you have made one here. . JRW.

Hard to see what the mistake is.

On 24 Nov 17:14, Critic11 makes this edit.
At 17:16, this account is created.
More damning: on 8 December, at 18:55, Critic22 makes this edit
at 18:59, this account make this edit
at 19:02, Critic11 makes this edit

All on the same IP; no other editors on the same IP other than checkuser verified abusive alternate accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 22:54, 11 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest unblock request is likely to be declined in the near future if you cannot convince others that the confirmed sockpuppet accounts are genuinely nothing to do with you. -- Trevj (talk · contribs) 15:50, 18 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]