User talk:Jessas
Welcome
[edit]Welcome!
Hello, Jessas, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}}
on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! IZAK 07:37, 10 September 2006 (UTC)
{{unblock|[[Wikipedia:Autoblock|Collateral damage]]}}
{{blockinfo
| ip = [[Special:Contributions/63.150.149.226|63.150.149.226]]
| admin = [[User:Kukini|Kukini]]
| reason = repeated POV pushing post requests to stop
}}
- IP address now blocked for anonymous users only. As long as you are logged in, you should be able to edit. Sorry for the inconvenience and happy editing! ➨ ЯEDVERS 09:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Hi, and welcome! FYI, I have removed the link you just added to this article. I felt it is unfair to many thousands of well-known people to make an example of a 1-line stub of someone not as notable. Hope you understand and don't take it personally. Cheers and happy editing. ←Humus sapiens ну? 08:14, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
The page you created appears to be an advert
[edit]A tag has been placed on Voce, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group or service and which would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.
If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Retiono Virginian 16:36, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Gershon Weisenfeld
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f7/Nuvola_apps_important.svg/48px-Nuvola_apps_important.svg.png)
A tag has been placed on Gershon Weisenfeld requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}}
to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. GtstrickyTalk or C 16:57, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- If you don't want to see this article deleted, you need to provide some verified information as to why this particular rabbi is noteworthy. See our rules on reliable source for more guidelines as to what constitutes verified information. As the article currently stands, it could be deleted at any moment. --Orange Mike | Talk 17:15, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
- I removed the speedy tag while you work on the article. Please see the article talk page for more information. Thank you GtstrickyTalk or C 17:36, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Judaism Newsletter
[edit]![]() The WikiProject Judaism Newsletter
| |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This newsletter was automatically delivered by ShepBot because you are a member of the WikiProject. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. Delivered by §hepBot (Disable) on 04:28, 4 July 2008 (UTC)
WikiProject Judaism Newsletter
[edit]
The Judaism Newsletter
| |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list.
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 02:40, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
The Judaism Newsletter
[edit]
The Judaism Newsletter
| |||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
This newsletter was automatically delivered because you are a member of one or more Judaism related WikiProjects. If you would like to opt out of future mailings, please remove your name from this list. As always, please direct all questions, comments, requests, barnstars, offers of help, and angry all-caps anti-semitic rants to my talk page. Thanks, and have a great month. L'Aquatique[approves|this|message] 20:31, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
- Newsletter delivery by xenobot 21:19, 31 August 2008 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs
[edit] Hello Jessas! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to this article, it would greatly help us with the current 750 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:
- Baruch Chait - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Gershon Wiesenfeld has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No indication of notability.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jayjg (talk) 00:24, 26 October 2010 (UTC)
Nomination of Baruch Chait for deletion
[edit]![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Baruch Chait until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.