User talk:JimBob2u
|
Hello! JimBob2u,
you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. It's an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us! Keilana|Parlez ici 00:47, 8 August 2012 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Snowysusan 07:34, 13 August 2012 (UTC)August 2012
[edit]
Your addition to 69th Bomb Squadron has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you for helping Wikipedia. I acknowledge that you are trying to help, and if you want help re-adding the material back on the page that I have removed, please ask and I will be more than willing to help you. Thanks you, and have a wonderful day! Kevin Rutherford (talk) 06:46, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of The Alpine Milkman for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Alpine Milkman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Alpine Milkman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 07:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Harry Stickel for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry Stickel is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Stickel until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 07:30, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Some notes about the above
[edit]So, as you have seen, I am willing to help you add back in the material on the 69's page. In terms of the plane article, I really don't see anything that establishes notability. In terms of Harry's article, I again see nothing that really establishes notability. If you can find anything in terms of independent news clippings and whatnot that state that the plane and Harry have done anything much more notable than what is there, please add them and let me know, but I honestly cannot find any reason to have them on the site at this time. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 07:38, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Furthermore, you have done some pretty high-quality work, and I would encourage you not to get discouraged at the above templates, as you are doing work that far exceeds many new editors here. If you are interested, in writing some articles, let me know and I will find you some that need writing, which are along the line of what you have been writing. Kevin Rutherford (talk) 07:41, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
April 2020
[edit]
Hello, I'm JackintheBox. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Grand Aire Express—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. JACKINTHEBOX • TALK 01:23, 20 April 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |