User talk:Jionpedia/Archive 6
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Jionpedia. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Re: Barfi!
I have not watched the film and do not have enough idea on it! --Tito Dutta (talk) 14:20, 2 January 2013 (UTC)
- You have never been rude to me,I dont remember,What are you talking about.---zeeyanketu talk to me 17:43, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
Barfi!
Yes. :) Why not? I have expanded the casting section of Barfi!. I am working on the development part also. It's glad to know about you through your page that at such age you are doing so well. Good. I'll always encourage you more.
Arjann (talk) 17:55, 9 January 2013 (UTC)
- Do you really think 100% rating is possible.---zeeyanketu talk to me 18:14, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- You can discuss with some editors like smaro and Dwaipyan too because i cant believe a film like Jab Tak Hain Jaan got 100% rating.---zeeyanketu talk to me 18:21, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
- If this is the case,then Reviews from rotton tomatoes should not be added there,I have clearly seen biasing in the article.Plz Dont mind.---zeeyanketu talk to me 18:31, 10 January 2013 (UTC)
This is epic. Rotten Tomatoes shouldn't be added because some fanboy doesn't like that JTHJ has 100%? What? I honestly thought I'd heard and read everything crazy but this takes the cake. Ashermadan (talk) 01:04, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
Jab Tak Hai Jaan
Pleasant, Zeeyanketu plans to challenge your Rotten Tomatoes decision by adding a neutral point of view tag, look [here]. Why is he doing this? Is he that upset that Rotten Tomatoes has been mentioned? Ashermadan (talk) 00:37, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Taare Zameen Par
Hey, could you please elaborate on your comments at the Taare Zameen Par discussion? Thanks. Ωphois 15:20, 22 January 2013 (UTC)
Opinion Needed
We need you to decide if the Film Fail Awards, another negative award like the Golden Kelas which we decided to include due to it being an RS, were truly RS. Top Indian critics have come out with the nominations. I have discussed this in detail on the Dabangg 2 talk page and have added the awards to Jab Tak Hai Jaan, Agneepath, Dabangg 2, Ek Tha Tiger and am in the process of updating other sites. Zee is saying that the awards are user voted, but the Ghantas and Golden Kelas which we decided should be included were also user voted, just like the Filmfare Awards, Zee Awards, Public Choice Awards, etc. which all have user votes. So if you could pitch in and tell us why they're RS or not I'd appreciate it. Thanks! Ashermadan (talk) 22:16, 23 January 2013 (UTC)
Invitation from WikiProject Bangladesh Premier League
Hi there! I thought you might be interested in WikiProject Bangladesh Premier League. We're currently facing problems to run this project and we need your help! If you have a spare moment, please join and help us.--Pratyya (Hello!) 11:30, 26 January 2013 (UTC) |
Table JTHJ
Hey, the table you changed actually were the weekend positions, not the opening day positions. I changed the whole table to weekend positions as you did because it's just a better reflection of the film's performance. The reference from YRF says all of that and shows the #US8 weekend position. Ashermadan (talk) 17:59, 26 January 2013 (UTC)
Re: sandbox
Yes, you can prepare a draft of an article in sandbox.--Dwaipayan (talk) 21:28, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Placement of alternate titles
Hey, just wanted to let you know that the discussion regarding TZP's DVD title has been moved to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Film#Placement of alternate titles, in case you wanted to give any input regarding it (especially since it may impact future titles since the discussion is on the film project talk page). Thanks. Ωphois 00:30, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
Talk pages
I just undid your blanking of Talk: Jab Tak Hai Jaan. I'm not sure why you did it; I marked it as vandalism, then realized it may have just been an error. Sorry about that. In any event, talk page comments should be left intact as a record of what's been said; a bot will automatically archive the sections later. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:43, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
personal attack?
Elaborate... Film Fan (talk) 11:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- Nothing? If you're going to give me a warning, tell me why. Film Fan (talk) 12:38, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
File:Wake up sid.jpg listed at Redirects for discussion
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect File:Wake up sid.jpg. Since you had some involvement with the File:Wake up sid.jpg redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:26, 5 February 2013 (UTC)
JTHJ
Hey, I updated the references to TOI, Hindustan Times, DNA India, etc. all should be RS now. Can you double check and make sure all are RS? Ashermadan (talk) 00:52, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
File:Monsters, Inc. 3D.jpg listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Monsters, Inc. 3D.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2013 (UTC)