User talk:Jkmstevens

License tagging for Image:IMGP0045-1.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:IMGP0045-1.JPG. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 20:08, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

RuBee

As you might have noticed on Talk:RuBee and the deletion log, other editors had raised concerned about uneyclopedic material/nonsense in the article. The article was deleted by User:Phil Sandifer. I restored it, because I believe that addressing specific issues is better than deleting the whole article without any discussion. I initially reverted the article to original version, so that it doesn't get deleted again for the same reason. Then I made a second edit, in which I restored the version before deletion, minus two sections ("How RuBee works" and "RuBee Feng Shui"). The two sections removed by me didn't contain any references, bordered on original research and their tone was unencyclopedic (see WP:TONE). As I mentioned in the edit summary, anybody is free to re-add these sections with proper changes. utcursch | talk 15:19, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Utcursch - thanks for fast reply - Not sure I agree with you about two sections.. I count 15 references to back up what is said and think what is said is quite material - for example you deleted and EDN article on near vs far field - critical to entire section

Maxwell's equations can hardly be considered original research .. can go line by line if you like.

reference to Aether was removed (377 ohms) that is an important constant right up with C speed of light and two are linked tightly - it is not original research ...

reference to loop antennas in wiki was removed - again fundamental to all induction and again far from original research ..

reference to tuned circuits was removed - again fundamental and not now in article .. not original research

Tone section I have read carefully and easy to make more formal if thats required, however this can be a difficult area for non-professionals - I am a Physicists and have taught at Penn, Columbia, and Univ of Toronto for near 30 years and find a soft tone makes easier to understand.

Might be better to suggest that in discussion sections so those of us who worked hard on this get a chance to respond before you delete ...

I am a scientists with 100's of published papers and two books - I understand original research verifiable quit well - no original research is contained in this article as it was written, and every line is and was verifiable ...

My suggestion - we revert back to original and deal with any issues point by point, line by line publically in discussion section as per WiKi rules - if you make reasonable suggested changes or can show that any of the content is "original research" we take it out - if tone needs to be modified can deal with that item by item -- but needs to be a process here .. not unilateral judgments, or Wikipedia loses all of its credability and so do you as an administrator ..

this was not a balanced well thought out process and material is now incomprehensible.. It was I believe a biased process - proof is I am glad to go over it line by line with anyone -

Is that fair ?

I have received many phone calls and complaints re your changes - this article is now incomprehensible does not make sense .....

John Stevens Ph.D.

Chair IEEE 1902.1

Like I said, I removed the content so that the article doesn't get deleted again by some other admin. Of course, you are much more knowledgeable than me, and I leave it up to you and other knowledgeable editors to deal with the issue. You might want to discuss this with Vlad Patryshev and Lurgyman63, who expressed concerns about inaccuracies/other issues on Talk:RuBee. Please be bold in editing, and in case of any editing disputes, please follow the guidelines at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes. utcursch | talk 16:49, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Utcursch - The talk section from both Vald and Lurgyman is perty thin - nothing focused or specific - I suspect they both have other motives (e.g Vald comment "this is crap") How do I respond ? not what I would expect from a responsible editor or administrator - I have sent both emails and asked to be specific with no response - I will revert back to old version and again offer to make any changes in content providing specific issues are raised ...

Maybe I mentioned that 17 independent companies passed this in 1902.1 workgrp including Epson Motorola, Microsoft, GM, GE LG Electronics, Bearing Point - they are now all mad at me for not maintaining site - they all seemed happy with old stuff - comes up very high on Google hits - Epson CEO in US -- was very upset - just seems like number of agendas on Wikipedia and full time to police ...

Thansk again for help

John Stevens —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.46.202.162 (talk) 18:19, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 20:54, 1 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

File rename notification

A file you uploaded [1] has been renamed to File:Ru-Bee Radio tag.jpg as the original filename appeard to be a procedural name generated by the equipment (such as a camera or scanner) used to generate the media.

In line with current policy, efforts have been made to ensure usages and links to this media have been updated.

If you feel this notification to be in error, please conatct myself or an administrator. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:54, 20 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Gate Guard 20 (Type X mat) transparent 01 2.png

Thanks for uploading File:Gate Guard 20 (Type X mat) transparent 01 2.png, which you've sourced to Visible Assets, Inc. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 00:06, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of automated file description generation

Your upload of File:810G-PEN.png or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 11:11, 3 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:Ru-Bee Radio tag.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Ru-Bee Radio tag.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:04, 5 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline

Hello, I'm BlackcurrantTea. I noticed that many of your edits are connected with RuBee, and that on your user page you describe yourself (albeit in the third person) as the CEO of the company that owns RuBee. It doesn't look like anyone's mentioned Wikipedia's conflict of interest guideline to you, so I'm going to add a template after this with the basic information and links to more details. If you have any questions, you can post a reply to me on this page; I'll keep it on my watchlist for a while. Thanks, BlackcurrantTea (talk) 18:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Jkmstevens. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.

Proposed deletion of File:VAI-Noise.jpg

The file File:VAI-Noise.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Zero context as to what this graph represents or could be used for.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 19:28, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Covered shelf 6.jpg

The file File:Covered shelf 6.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 20 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Table-3LayerSecurity.png

The file File:Table-3LayerSecurity.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:34, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Three-LayerSecurity.png

The file File:Three-LayerSecurity.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:38, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Weapon rack-01.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Weapon rack-01.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Salavat (talk) 03:55, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Cow Pen 05e zone.jpg

The file File:Cow Pen 05e zone.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Orphaned file with no obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 03:57, 18 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]