User talk:Joanna Gunadi
Block
[edit]
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 15:42, 7 November 2015 (UTC)
Joanna Gunadi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
please im seriously i want my editing back as usual
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. HighInBC 15:50, 12 November 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Joanna Gunadi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
This is my original account had blocked, i want my editing back, can?
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. --jpgordon::==( o ) 15:10, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Might I suggest that some explanation of what you did wrong and why you won't do it again would be needed here if an admin is to consider unblocking? (Also, and I don't mean to be rude, is your English really good enough to be working on the English language Wikipedia or would you perhaps be better on the Wikipedia in your main language?) 823510731 (talk) 13:39, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
Joanna Gunadi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
please may my editing back again as usual, can?
Decline reason:
You're totally refusing to understand why you're blocked and what is required to be unblocked despite this being explained to you numerous times. Because this is a competence issue that's not going away, talk page access revoked. Max Semenik (talk) 12:40, 3 December 2015 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Proposed deletion of Tarra Budiman
[edit]
The article Tarra Budiman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Seemingly obvious non-notability and no improvement as the best my searches found were simply passing mentions at News and browsers, listed works seem to be otherwise trivial and nothing to suggest better attention.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SwisterTwister talk 09:12, 6 December 2015 (UTC)
Wikipedia and copyright
[edit]
While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.
- You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and a cited source. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
- Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
- Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
- Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. This is true both for content copied from the English Wikipedia as well as content you import from the Indonesian Wikipedia. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.
- It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing.
Please do not create any more accounts or edit while logged out. If you wish to be unblocked, please apply for unblock on the user talk page of your original account (user talk:Joanna Gunadi). You will not be unblocked until you can prove to us that you understand copyright law, attribution, and how they apply to Wikipedia editing. -- Diannaa (talk) 04:08, 10 December 2015 (UTC)
Requesting unblocking
[edit]If you wish to appeal against your block, you should make a request through the Unblock Ticket Request System. Note that appeals on the lines of just "please unblock me, I won't do it again" are likely to fall on deaf ears and you should address the issue of why you were blocked and how you will ensure it won't happen again. Also do not make appeals or other edits anonymously while you are blocked as this will just lead to the IP addresses being blocked and will hinder your appeal process. Optimist on the run (talk) 09:11, 13 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Joanna Gunadi. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Template:Nickelodeon Indonesia Kids' Choice Awards requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion because it is an unused duplicate of another template, or a hard-coded instance of another template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.
If the template is not actually the same as the other template noted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page explaining how this one is different so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{substituted}}</noinclude>).
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page's talk page, where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 07:09, 23 June 2017 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:GAJAHALBUM.jpg
[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:GAJAHALBUM.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:33, 24 November 2017 (UTC)
The article Five Minutes (Indonesian band) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:MUSICBIO - blogsites are not acceptable or reliable sources.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dan arndt (talk) 09:39, 1 December 2021 (UTC)