User talk:Joeseth1992

I Need To Be Adopted!!!

Joeseth...

This is Andrew Rice. Go read the stuff I put on your profile. In order to see your profile, go click on 'user page,' if you are already on your talk page... or right at the top, click where it says, 'Joeseth1992'. Then click edit this page, and go to the bottom... read the things I have said about the Userboxes... they are little things that can tell other Wikipedians about you... and are very useful. As we have "already discussed," go choose the ones you like and place the codes for them in place of that text i left in the brackets. (Also, remember when you are leaving messages on Discussion Pages, sign your messages with four of these: ~ You'll find them somewhere on your keyboard...) Iamandrewrice (talk) 17:15, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well done, you have made your first one. I would like to inform you that for today, I am a female called Ben. Please pass this information round to any other users you feel the need to spread this to. Thank you for your co-operation...and welcome to wikipedia... enjoy... i know I did...
Iamandrewrice (talk) 18:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well Done Joeseth1992

As your adopter, I would like to give you your next task... I would like you to visit User:Jeffpw and thank him on his talkpage for adopting me, so that I could adopt you, so that you could adopt him. Or whatever you feel like... Good Luck! and remember: A new name a day keeps Whitstable at bay... Iamandrewrice (talk) 18:31, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 18:41, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You are well on the way to becoming an administrator if i say so myself!

I am sure Jeff will let you adopt him!
However, when signing your messages to people, you MUST MUST MUST buy your pizzas from the crust! But also, you MUST sign the message by putting 4 of these: ~
You really must put them, or people wont be able to contact you... Iamandrewrice (talk) 18:43, 26 November 2007 (UTC) (<-----------look, see this is what happens to those 4 squigglez)[reply]

Congratulations...

You are already better than User:Whitstable! Perhaps we should look through your interests on the user talkboxes and find you something you might like to edit. Well, it says your a vegetarian... so perhaps we could find you some work to do on Meat, or perhaps horses... well... maybe you could find yourself something. Just edit anything you feel unhappy with. As this is YOUR right as a wikipedian. And remember, as my adoptee, it is your duty to tell everyone what my name of the day is... and then it will be Jeffpw's duty to do the same for you when you adopt him. Iamandrewrice (talk) 18:56, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

well if those people have vandalised...

that is a very good thing to do! I see that you have also asked another user to adopt you. This is a good idea, you should at least aim to get adopted by around 20 wikipedians. Good Luck Chuck! And remember those squiggelz! Iamandrewrice (talk) 19:01, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning before block

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 19:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your message

I am very busy in both real life and here on Wikipedia. Unless you have questions about edits I have made, you can better not message me again. I really have no time and find silly messages like the one you left annoying. No reply is necessary (in fact, do not reply at all). Jeffpw (talk) 19:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You left a message at User talk:Jeffpw asking him to refrain from vandalism, but I can't see where he has vandalized anything. Above, he seems to have asked you not to reply to him; just not replying would have been better than an inappropriate warning. Remember that users who exhaust the community's patience are sometimes blocked. -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 19:10, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Explain

How is correcting the taxonomy of pages an "unconstructive edit"? You did see on my page that I am an administrator, which means that the community trusted me enough to grant me that access, and that I've logged more than 10,000 edits. Please explain with examples what you mean by "unconstructive edits", or please retract your accusation and apologize. --EncycloPetey (talk) 19:05, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I see. You decided to paste a generic "vandalism" warning into multiple user pages as rapdily as possible. Well, you have been previously warned about your disruptive edits so I guess harassment is just one step away. --EncycloPetey (talk) 20:18, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

if you feel like you are in the right...

then you should complain. However, I am offering a neutral point of view here and am not going to say what you should do either way... but you should stand up for what you believe is right! if someone is rude to you, then you go make a complaint on this: [1]
However, you must do whatever you want yourself. Good luck chuck! Iamandrewrice (talk) 19:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeseth1992 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was going on recent changes and trying to find people vandalising and i accidentally put a message on an administrators talk page when they wern't actually vandilising, It was a complete mistake and when i tried to send an apology message i found that I was already blocked. Very Sorry. I wasn't trying to harass anyone or be annoying.

Decline reason:

Sorry, but there is only a little more than 24h left, I think you can wait a day or more. If you wish for an unblock, I suggest that you email the sysop who issued you the block. The block stands. — Avec nat...Wikipédia Prends Des Forces. 16:37, 28 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:38, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism?

What is this [2] all about? Whitstable (talk) 22:05, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Indeed. None of your edits since your block was lifted seem to be of a serious nature. I would advise you to think before you hit the edit button again, lest your next block be even longer. Jeffpw (talk) 22:12, 29 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This time you have been blocked for one week. This is not what Wikipedia is about. Your entire edit history consists of non-constructive edits and postings of random text (sometimes rude, sometimes offensive) to User pages. --EncycloPetey (talk) 03:16, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Adoption

Hello Joeseth1992! Thank you for the contact regarding adoption. I would be more than happy to do this!

If you can get back to me as to what you would like to learn initially, perhaps share a little info about what your aims are on Wikipedia, then we can initiate proceedings. Hope to hear from you soon! -- Jza84 · (talk) 02:23, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeseth1992 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Hello, Dear Reader. I have recently been blocked, being accused of attempted harrassment of other users. however, i was simply trying to impress a potential adopter with an extravigant story that i hoped would show my english skills. as a new user, under WP:AGF i would expect to have been given the benefit of the doubt, as this is what the policy clearly expresses, especially concerning a new user, who would be unaware of the processes involved at wikipedia. I attempted to get adopted, so that i could learn about these complex rules. however, on infringement of WP:BITE I was expected to have a full understanding of wikipedia already, even though i was attempting to act contributively to the site, whereby you should have assumed good faith. Please unblock me so that I can continue with the adoption process and learn the ways of wikipedia. I would like to continue the adoption proceess as soon as possible, and become a better wikipedian and a helpful contriuter with the help of my adopter. Thank - you for you time

Decline reason:

Sorry, but this simply has no place here. — Yamla 17:44, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeseth1992 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Reader. I have recently been blocked, being accused of attempted harrassment of other users. however, i was simply trying to impress a potential adopter with an extravigant story that i hoped would show my english skills. This story is by famous Indian Author, Alex Francais George Bolton. I saw no problem with this intentiuonally comic story, and I sincerely apologise is some found it offensive or harassment, But i assure you that i had no idea that people would react this way. As a new user, under WP:AGF i would expect to have been given the benefit of the doubt, as this is what the policy clearly expresses, especially concerning a new user, who would be unaware of the processes involved at wikipedia. I attempted to get adopted, so that i could learn about these complex rules. however, on infringement of WP:BITE I was expected to have a full understanding of wikipedia already, even though i was attempting to act contributively to the site, whereby you should have assumed good faith. Please unblock me so that I can continue with the adoption process and learn the ways of wikipedia. I would like to continue the adoption proceess as soon as possible, and become a better wikipedian and a helpful contriuter with the help of my adopter. Thank - you for you time

Decline reason:

I tried hard to assume good faith, but I just couldn't think of any way that a user could innocently believe that this was acceptable or helpful, even if they were new to Wikipedia. — FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:10, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I want to encourage you to stop making identical unblock requests and use your week off more wisely, so I'm removing your ability to edit this talk page. The talk page will be unprotected at the same time that your block expires.-FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 18:35, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Joeseth1992 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Dear Reader. I have recently been blocked, being accused of attempted harrassment of other users. however, i was simply trying to impress a potential adopter with an extravigant story that i hoped would show my english skills and showing that i am not single minded and i can explore various texts from around the world and i could be a useful adition to wikipedia if this person gave me a chance. This story is by famous Indian Author, Alex Francais George Bolton. I saw no problem with this intentiuonally comic story, and I sincerely apologise is some found it offensive or harassment, But i assure you that i had no idea that people would react this way. As a new user, under WP:AGF i would expect to have been given the benefit of the doubt, as this is what the policy clearly expresses, especially concerning a new user, who would be unaware of the processes involved at wikipedia. I attempted to get adopted, so that i could learn about these complex rules. however, on infringement of WP:BITE I was expected to have a full understanding of wikipedia already, even though i was attempting to act contributively to the site, whereby you should have assumed good faith. Please unblock me so that I can continue with the adoption process and learn the ways of wikipedia. I would like to put any doubt out of your mind that this was an act od deliberate harassment of annoyance. I just wanted to fit in, and i realise now that using that famous indian comic story may have not been the way best to do it, But i have learnt from my mistakes and i assure you that i will not be making the same ones again. I would like to continue the adoption proceess as soon as possible, and become a better wikipedian and a helpful contriuter with the help of my adopter. Thank - you for you time

Decline reason:

For the third time, no, for the same reasons as the last two times. Bencherlite ^Talk 19:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Obviously full protection is required. Jeffpw 19:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I am now fully protecting your talk page, due to your abuse of the unblock template, so that only administrators will be able to leave comments here until your block is over. Bencherlite ^Talk 19:29, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Block timer reset

You were caught setting up other accounts to avoid your block in violation of WP:BLOCK and WP:SOCK. Your block timer has been reset. Please refrain from any such actions in the future or your block will be extended, perhaps indefinitely. --Yamla 20:47, 30 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It is now reset to indefinite per a checkuser request here: Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/Iamandrewrice Kwsn (Ni!) 05:33, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]