User talk:Jonathan Harold Koszeghi/Archive 13

Archive 10

Archive 11

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

→

Archive 17

Orphaned non-free image File:Isaiah Washington as Preston Burke in 2006.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Isaiah Washington as Preston Burke in 2006.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:27, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

May 2012

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Please make sure to include an edit summary. Please provide one before saving your changes to an article, as the summaries are quite helpful to people browsing an article's history. Thanks! TRLIJC19 (talk) 18:23, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grey's Anatomy (season 2)

The article Grey's Anatomy (season 2) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Grey's Anatomy (season 2) for things which need to be addressed. TRLIJC19 (talk) 19:16, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jonathan Harold Koszeghi. You have new messages at TRLIJC19's talk page.
Message added 13:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Regarding the GAN of the page you nominated. TRLIJC19 (talk) 13:00, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jonathan Harold Koszeghi. You have new messages at Talk:Grey's Anatomy (season 2)/GA1.
Message added 15:58, 11 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TRLIJC19 (talk) 15:58, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Grey's Anatomy Eigth Season DVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grey's Anatomy Eigth Season DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:51, 11 May 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jonathan Harold Koszeghi. You have new messages at Talk:Grey's Anatomy (season 2)/GA1.
Message added 02:16, 12 May 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TRLIJC19 (talk) 02:16, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grey's Anatomy (season 2)

The article Grey's Anatomy (season 2) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grey's Anatomy (season 2) for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? TRLIJC19 (talk) 12:28, 12 May 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grey's Anatomy (season 1)

The article Grey's Anatomy (season 1) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grey's Anatomy (season 1) for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? TRLIJC19 (talk) 11:33, 15 May 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Lost (TV series)‎

The article Lost (TV series)‎ you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Lost (TV series)‎ for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. AIRcorn (talk) 06:37, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Grey's Anatomy Eigth Season DVD.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Grey's Anatomy Eigth Season DVD.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:32, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grey's Anatomy (season 3)

The article Grey's Anatomy (season 3) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Grey's Anatomy (season 3) for things which need to be addressed. TRLIJC19 (talk) 13:57, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Katherine Heigl at the 2007 Emmys.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Katherine Heigl at the 2007 Emmys.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:31, 20 May 2012 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:The third season cast of Grey's Anatomy.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The third season cast of Grey's Anatomy.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:09, 21 May 2012 (UTC)

Remove your FLC

For the final time, I highly recommend you remove your FLC until the GA is passed. You should not have two nominations open until the other is passed. TRLIJC19 (talk) 11:10, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

List can not be Good articles and vice versa. These look like articles so I would not nominate them for Featured List. AIRcorn (talk) 11:46, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

AirCorn, season articles are able to become good articles, as shown at Parks and Recreation (season 3), and those pages become featured lists not articles, because of their episode lists included as a subsection, as shown at Glee (season 1). TRLIJC19 (talk) 12:13, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

There is obviously a grey area around the definition of "articles with lists" and "lists with prose". This could be an interesting issue to resolve, I might see what WT:GAN thinks. AIRcorn (talk) 12:23, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok found this. It appears you can be either a Featured list or a Good article not both. Season articles appear to be right in the centre of the fuzzyness. As these have already been rated as Good I would suggest that they be left as articles. AIRcorn (talk) 13:14, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Ok, I appreciate you looking that up. Jonathan, I'd recommend withdrawing the FLCs and when ready, nominating at FAC. TRLIJC19 (talk) 13:26, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

But what if I remove the Good Article title and stick with Featured List? Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 15:10, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

You can do that too, but I believe you should just get GA and nominate for FA. TRLIJC19 (talk) 15:22, 24 May 2012 (UTC)

Edit Summary

Hi Jonathan. I now trust you, as an editor, and know that you wouldn't do anything harmful to pages. But all the Grey's pages are on my watchlist, and I always have to check what users do to the page with their edits, just to make sure. If you don't know about it, there is an edit summary below the edit box, every time you make an edit. In the edit summary, you briefly describe what you did with that edit. If you would start doing this, I wouldn't have to check as many pages, and other users would appreciate it as well. I'd really appreciate it, and it looks good for an editor to do that. Thanks, TRLIJC19 (talk) 13:25, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Oh, I see. I am sorry. I have been aware of the edit summary box, but I only used I made consistent contributions. I will definitely be using the box everytime I edit a page. And thank you for your trust which makes me feel a more capable contributor! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 13:31, 26 May 2012 (UTC)

Grey's Anatomy

Hello! Did you get to read through Grey's Anatomy since I made the changes? The article was in horrible shape and I used peer review advice to make it FA quality. I added production, critical reception, merchandise, series synopsis, and distribution. I applied for a peer review and then plan to nominate for FA. Just thought I'd share, since we seem to be the only fully active members of WP:Grey's. Another member, Frickative, used to be very active, but I haven't seen her around. Let me know what you think of the article's rewrite, TRLIJC19 (talk) 12:31, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

I have just entered Wikipedia and I how amazing your development of the article was! You must have worked so hard! You have all my respect and I wish my contributions will someday be like yours. You covered every single aspect! You must have browsed through the whole internet! You have my appreciation and respect! You should definitely nominate the article for FA! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 12:37, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

By the way, I have developed Grey's Anatomy (season 4) in the last few days and I really hope you can review it for GA. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 12:39, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you so much! Yes, I will definitely nominate for FA, but I am awaiting a peer review, from someone whose dealt with FAC a lot, to review one final time, before nominating. Regarding the GAN, I'll check how many edits and what kind I've made to the article, and if good, I'll review. TRLIJC19 (talk) 12:54, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

I've only made reverts, so I'll be reviewing. TRLIJC19 (talk) 12:58, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

I am looking forward to it. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 14:07, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grey's Anatomy (season 4)

The article Grey's Anatomy (season 4) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within seven days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Grey's Anatomy (season 4) for things which need to be addressed. TRLIJC19 (talk) 15:47, 28 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	Hearty Congratulations!
	For beautiful efforts in improving articles related to Grey's Anatomy and taking them to good quality. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:12, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for your appreciation! I am so pleased to know that my work has made a difference. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 13:28, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

It does make difference! I am a recent fan of this show. But i have accidentally read too much. I am still watching Season 4. Thats one bad thing you did by writing these articles. §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:40, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

I am positively sure you are going to become addicted to this great series! Thank you again. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 13:42, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Yeah! Already "coded"! §§AnimeshKulkarni (talk) 13:49, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Grey's Anatomy (season 4)

The article Grey's Anatomy (season 4) you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Grey's Anatomy (season 4) for comments about the article. Well done! There is a backlog of articles waiting for review, why not help out and review a nominated article yourself? TRLIJC19 (talk) 16:29, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Grey's Anatomy Task/Assignment

Hi there! So, I'm initiating a task for WikiProject GA. The project has so much potential, and I feel it can become one of the best scopes on Wikipedia, if enough time is put in. That being said, we do not have enough active members. The only two are me and you. So, I've come up with a way to recruit members into the project. So here are the steps:
1. Add all Grey's Anatomy related articles to your watchlist.
2. Check your watchlist frequently, looking for users.
3. If you see a user (not an IP) make at least two (2) edits, to any Grey's Anatomy-related page, in any way...
4. Post this template I've created: {{WP-Grey'sAnatomy}} to their talk page.

(The template appears like this):

Invitation!

Hello Jonathan Harold Koszeghi, I would like to thank you for your contributions to a Grey's Anatomy-related article. Since it appears you are interested in this topic, I would like to personally invite you to join WikiProject Grey's Anatomy! This project consists of a group of users, collaborating to make articles related to Grey's Anatomy better. Our primary goal is to get as many articles as we can promoted to good and featured statuses, by developing, and reverting vandalism to them. We would be extraordinarily pleased if you decided to join our WikiProject, and help make a difference. If you are interested, all you have to do is add this code: [[Category:WikiProject Grey's Anatomy participants]], to your user page, and you are officially a member. If you are having trouble joining, or have any questions, please do not hesitate to ask me. Again, thank you for your help, and I hope to see you as a member of the project soon! {{{1}}}

5. If they decide to join the article, welcome them using the welcome template (I'm working on making it now).

I hope you enjoy the idea, and hope to hear from you soon, TRLIJC19 (talk) 16:50, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Great idea! I believe that a lot more users should contribute to Grey's Anatomy! I am very delighted with this idea. It's definitely practical! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 16:54, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I feel the same way. I'm almost done with the welcome template, I'll post it on your talk page when it's done. TRLIJC19 (talk) 16:58, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Template for welcoming users to Wikiproject Greys

Hi, the template is {{WLCMGA}}. TRLIJC19 (talk) 17:13, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Great! I really hope it will be helpful! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 17:17, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Grey's Anatomy (season 1)

Hi, Jonathan. Would you mind rewriting the information you just copied to season one, so it differs from the main page? This is because, when I nominate for FA, many users will think that I copied info from another page, and that never looks good. Thank you, TRLIJC19 (talk) 18:01, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Yes, of course. I am so sorry! It didn't occur to me. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 18:49, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for understanding! TRLIJC19 (talk) 18:51, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

You shouldn't thank me. It was my mistake. I'm sorry. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 18:54, 30 May 2012 (UTC)

WikiProject Grey's Anatomy

Hi, I was just wondering why you removed yourself as a member of WikiProject Grey's Anatomy? The code is not on your userpage.. TRLIJC19 (talk) 17:05, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Oh, I have just noticed! I don't know what happened. I think that when I added my "Good Article template" for Grey's Anatomy (season 4), I might have deleted the userbox for WP:Grey's. I will add it immediately. :) Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 17:09, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Okay, good! I thought you lost interest in the project, and got worried! TRLIJC19 (talk) 17:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Lol. That's not gonna happen any time soon! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 17:12, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Good, you're a great asset to the project. TRLIJC19 (talk) 17:13, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

I feel so content to have your appreciation. Thanks a lot! Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 17:17, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

How do you feel about Lexie's death and Teddy's departure? It reminded me of George's death and Izzie's departure in season six. I was very disappointed and upset. TRLIJC19 (talk) 17:22, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

I was just devastated to see Lexie die. She was so repulsive to me for the first two seasons she appeared in, but I have come to love her! Before "Flight" aired I suspected that Arizona was the one that would die. As for Teddy's departure, I didn't come to understand that character so much. She was a nice presence, but that's it. I can't actually say that I'm going to miss her, even if the Owen-Cristina-Teddy intrigues were one of my favorite moments for the past three seasons. Jonathan Harold Koszeghi (talk) 17:48, 31 May 2012 (UTC)