User talk:Jonnyboms

November 2009

You should wait for others to write an article about subjects in which you are personally involved, as you did at Jonathan Bomser. This applies to articles about you, your achievements, your band, your business, your publications, your website, your relatives, and any other possible conflict of interest.

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not "notable" under Wikipedia guidelines, creating an article about yourself may violate the policy that Wikipedia is not a personal webspace provider and would thus qualify for speedy deletion. If your achievements, etc., are verifiable and genuinely notable, and thus suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later. (See Wikipedia:Wikipedians with articles.) Thank you. noq (talk) 18:56, 9 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Touchsuite for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Touchsuite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Touchsuite until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | Naypta^talk opened his mouth at 16:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Touchsuite

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Touchsuite, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:10, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rachel Zietz (October 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a webhost of business job listing or other things best suited for someone's own website or listing; for articles to be accepted, a substantial amount of actual in-depth third-party news, but not press releases, trivial passing mentions, mere triviality such as funding, partnerships with other people or companies, financing or interviews. Among several things here, it seems it's simply too soon especially considering if the best award there is for "Influential Teens of 2016" (which has actually not been used before for notability).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachel Zietz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 19:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Rachel Zietz has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rachel Zietz. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 19:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jonnyboms (talk) 17:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Zeitz page. If you wouldn't mind...and I hate to bother you. I fully respect and understand your position. Even with The New York Times writing a full feature about her? She appeared on Shark Tank, She is doing multi-millions dollars worth of sales at now, 16...and the fact that her companies products are being carried nationwide in Dick's Sporting Goods? I am confused how this is not a wikipedia entry for a true entrepreneur and American success story? She a virtuoso of business in my humble opinion. Either way, thank you very much for taking so much time to explain your position. This is a learning curve....

Your draft article, Draft:Rachel Zietz

Hello, Jonnyboms. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Rachel Zietz".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 17:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]